Performance evaluation of six digital mammography systems

被引:1
|
作者
Perez, Alessandra Maia Marques Martinez [1 ]
Lopes, Laura Alcantara Silva [1 ]
Caron, Renato Franca [2 ]
Oliveira, Bruno Beraldo [2 ]
Poletti, Martin Eduardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Fis, FFCLRP, BR-14040901 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Barretos Canc Hosp, Dept Prevencao, BR-14784400 Barretos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Digital mammography; Detectors; MTF; NNPS; DQE; IMAGE QUALITY CHARACTERIZATION; DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY; PHYSICAL-CHARACTERISTICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111635
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The strong advance in digital mammography as a tool for breast cancer screening requires that the new systems be characterized. Quality control protocols describe the methodology to evaluate systems performance. Detective quantum efficiency (DQE) is the most suitable parameter for describing the imaging performance of an X-ray imaging device. The objective of this study was to characterize in terms of DQE six digital mammography systems, at different detector air kerma (DAK) levels for a variety of beam qualities. A Carestream EHR-M3 CR detector, a small field digital mammography system Siemens Opdima, and full field digital mammography systems Planmed Clarity, GE Essential, GE Pristina and GE Crystal Nova were characterized using the European Guidelines protocol. Modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectrum (NNPS) and DQE were determined, for an extended detector air kerma range. Attenuated beam qualities (obtained by adding 2 mm Al to the corresponding beam qualities) used were 28 kV with anode/filter combination Mo/Mo for the EHRM3, Opdima, Essential and Pristina systems; 28 kV W/Ag for the Clarity; 28 kV W/Rh for the Crystal Nova; 28 kV Mo/Rh for the EHR-M3; and 34 kV Rh/Ag for the Pristina. Two groups were identified in MTF analysis, and the group composed of Clarity, Opdima and Essential presented the highest MTF values. In NNPS analysis, three main groups were identified, in which the systems Crystal Nova and Essential presented lower and higher NNPS, respectively. Crystal Nova system also exhibited higher DQE values for low spatial frequencies, while Opdima and Clarity presented higher DQE values for medium to high spatial frequency. Agreement with data from literature indicates that the systems evaluated are operating under typical conditions. Evidence of improvement in detectors performance was found.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France
    Stines, J.
    Noel, A.
    Heid, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (7-8): : 933 - 942
  • [2] Comparing the performance of digital mammography systems
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Oduko, Jennifer M.
    Gundogdu, Ozcan
    Alsager, Abdulaziz
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 732 - +
  • [3] A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems
    Monnin, P.
    Gutierrez, D.
    Bulling, S.
    Guntern, D.
    Verdun, F. R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (03) : 906 - 914
  • [4] Performance evaluation of a digital reading station for screening mammography
    Roelofs, T
    van Woudenberg, S
    Hendriks, J
    Bödicker, A
    Evertsz, C
    Karssemeijer, N
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 455 - 459
  • [5] Performances of different digital mammography imaging systems: Evaluation and comparison
    Bisogni, MG
    Bulajic, D
    Delogu, P
    Fantacci, ME
    Novelli, M
    Quattrocchi, M
    Rosso, V
    Stefanini, A
    [J]. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2005, 546 (1-2): : 14 - 18
  • [6] The evaluation of four small-field digital mammography systems
    CP Lawinski
    D Smith
    DS Evans
    A Mackenzie
    NSA Wells
    D Emerton
    CA Lewis
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 2 (Suppl 2)
  • [7] Evaluating digital mammography systems
    Berns, E
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (06) : 2074 - 2074
  • [8] Performance evaluation of a retrofit digital detector-based mammography system
    Marshall, Nicholas W.
    van Ongeval, Chantal
    Bosmans, Hilde
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (02): : 312 - 322
  • [9] Measured Dose versus Organ Dose Performance in Digital Mammography Systems
    McCullagh, James B.
    Baldelli, Paola
    Phelan, Niall
    [J]. DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2010, 6136 : 86 - +
  • [10] A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems
    Monnin, P
    Gutierrez, D
    Bulling, S
    Lepori, D
    Valley, JF
    Verdun, FR
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (11): : 2617 - 2631