Performances of different digital mammography imaging systems: Evaluation and comparison

被引:4
|
作者
Bisogni, MG [1 ]
Bulajic, D
Delogu, P
Fantacci, ME
Novelli, M
Quattrocchi, M
Rosso, V
Stefanini, A
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Fis E Fermi, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Pisa, Pisa, Italy
[3] Abdus Salaam Int Ctr Theoret Phys, Trieste, Italy
关键词
mammography; biological and medical physics; medical imaging equipment; solid-state detectors; image quality;
D O I
10.1016/j.nima.2005.03.016
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Digital mammography is entering routine clinical use and many commercial systems are now in use in the radiological units for screening and diagnostic mammography. At the same time, the research in the digital mammography field is very active in the development of more and more performing devices. In this paper we present the performance of single photon counting pixel detectors (MedipixI) tailored for digital mammographic applications. These devices are based on semiconductor (Si and GaAs) pixel detectors of different thickness, read-out by custom designed integrated circuits. To assess the imaging capability of such systems, the images of a mammographic phantom have been acquired in standard conditions for a clinical examination. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of details simulating tumor masses has been evaluated. The same phantom has been also radiographed by three different commercial digital mammographic systems in the same reference conditions and a comparison in terms of SNR has been carried out. The spatial resolution of the single photon counting systems has also been evaluated by measuring the line spread function with the edge technique and then calculating the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF). The MTFs of the single photon counting systems have been compared with the MTFs of the commercial systems. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of performances of analogical and digital SPECT/CT imaging systems
    Noponen, T. E. J.
    Tsukerman, L.
    Kiiliainen, H.
    Seppanen, M.
    Knuuti, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S17 - S17
  • [2] Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography
    Kilic, Pinar
    Sendur, Halit Nahit
    Gultekin, Serap
    Gultekin, Isil Imge
    Cindil, Emetullah
    Cerit, Mahinur
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (04) : 1891 - 1897
  • [3] Comparison of diagnostic performances in the evaluation of breast microcalcifications: synthetic mammography versus full-field digital mammography
    Pinar Kilic
    Halit Nahit Sendur
    Serap Gultekin
    Isil Imge Gultekin
    Emetullah Cindil
    Mahinur Cerit
    [J]. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2022, 191 : 1891 - 1897
  • [4] Designing digital imaging systems for mammography
    Roehrig, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 9404 - 9404
  • [5] A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems
    Monnin, P.
    Gutierrez, D.
    Bulling, S.
    Guntern, D.
    Verdun, F. R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (03) : 906 - 914
  • [6] Comparison of different detector materials for digital mammography
    Ford, NL
    Mainprize, JG
    Yaffe, MJ
    Yin, S
    Tümer, T
    Gordon, EE
    Hamilton, WJ
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 39 - 44
  • [7] Dosimetric and Contrast Noise Ratio Comparison of Three Different Digital Imaging Technologies in Mammography
    Prieto, Daniel
    Chiva, Miguel
    Maria Martinez, Ana
    Camara, Miguel
    Orozco, Felipe
    Carlos de Andres, Juan
    Jose Bejar, Maria
    Belen Capuz, Ana
    Colmenares, Rafael
    Sevillano, David
    Moris, Rafael
    David Garcia, Juan
    Garcia, Feliciano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2020, 51 (01) : 88 - 94
  • [8] Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening
    Kosus, Nermin
    Kosus, Aydin
    Duran, Muzeyyen
    Simavli, Serap
    Turhan, Nilgun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH-GERMAN GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 11 (03) : 152 - 157
  • [9] A simulation framework for the comparison of digital mammography imaging technology
    Yip, M.
    Rodriguez, D.
    Lewis, E.
    Wells, K.
    Young, K. C.
    [J]. 2007 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-11, 2007, : 3635 - +
  • [10] Performance evaluation of six digital mammography systems
    Perez, Alessandra Maia Marques Martinez
    Lopes, Laura Alcantara Silva
    Caron, Renato Franca
    Oliveira, Bruno Beraldo
    Poletti, Martin Eduardo
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2024, 218