Factors Associated with Inclusion of Japan in Phase I Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology

被引:0
|
作者
Maki, Akio [1 ]
Narukawa, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Med Pharmaceut Med, 5-9-1 Shirokane,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088641, Japan
关键词
Oncology; Phase I; Clinical trial; Drug development strategy; TRENDS; MEDICINE; FUTURE; LAG;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00655-0
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEarly inclusion of Japan in the global development program could be a key factor in reducing the drug lag, making participation in phase I multiregional clinical trials (Ph. I MRCTs) an important consideration for oncology drug development in Japan. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the inclusion of Japan in Ph. I MRCTs in oncology.MethodsWe compared the trial design, target population, type of primary tested drug, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile for Ph. I MRCTs with or without Japan conducted by the top 20 companies in more than two countries and started between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020.ResultsOne hundred and ninety-seven Ph. I MRCTs included Japan, and 697 did not. Detailed features of the Ph. I MRCTs in oncology were summarized, and several factors (trial design, target population, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile) associated with inclusion of Japan in the Ph. I MRCTs were identified.ConclusionsIt is important for Japanese subsidiaries within global pharmaceutical companies to closely communicate with the headquarters based on medical practice and unmet needs in Japan to join global development from an early stage. In addition, further efforts to attract emerging biopharmaceutical companies to Japan from the regulatory and/or political perspectives would be needed, thereby preventing drug lag in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 772
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Taking a Measured Approach to Toxicity Data in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials
    Sharma, Manish R.
    Ratain, Mark J.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (03) : 527 - 529
  • [32] EFFICACY PREDICTION IN PHASE I ONCOLOGY CLINICAL TRIALS USING DEEP LEARNING
    Aouchiche, B.
    Verlingue, L.
    Beinse, G.
    Massard, C.
    Borget, I
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S519 - S520
  • [33] Perceptions and Referral Trends into Phase I Oncology Trials: Results of a Clinical Survey
    Brunetto, Andre
    Olmos, David
    Arkenau, Hendrik-Tobias
    Tan, Daniel
    Yap, Timomy
    de Bono, Johann
    Barriuso, Jorge
    Kaye, Stan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 2011
  • [34] Reporting and impact of subsequent cycle toxicities in oncology phase I clinical trials
    Rami, Avina
    DuBois, Steven G.
    Campbell, Kevin
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2024, 21 (02) : 211 - 219
  • [35] Pharmacogenomics Testing in Phase I Oncology Clinical Trials: Constructive Criticism Is Warranted
    Sissung, Tristan M.
    Figg, William D.
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [36] An exploratory survey of nurses' perceptions of phase I clinical trials in pediatric oncology
    Chang, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 25 (01) : 14 - 23
  • [37] A tool for assessing adverse events in phase I/II oncology clinical trials
    Coombes, M.
    Mukherjee, S.
    Kowaleski, B.
    Levine, M.
    Cosby, J.
    Arnold, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [38] Phase I clinical trials in oncology: A review of the old and a look at the new.
    Felinnan, Bryan M.
    Hess, Kenneth R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [39] Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology
    Yada, Shinjo
    Hamada, Chikuma
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2017, 16 (02) : 114 - 121
  • [40] Utilization of palliative care consultations in pediatric oncology phase I clinical trials
    Cuviello, Andrea
    Boss, Renee
    Shah, Nirali
    Battles, Haven
    Beri, Andrea
    Wiener, Lori
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2019, 66 (08)