Factors Associated with Inclusion of Japan in Phase I Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology

被引:0
|
作者
Maki, Akio [1 ]
Narukawa, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Med Pharmaceut Med, 5-9-1 Shirokane,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088641, Japan
关键词
Oncology; Phase I; Clinical trial; Drug development strategy; TRENDS; MEDICINE; FUTURE; LAG;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00655-0
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEarly inclusion of Japan in the global development program could be a key factor in reducing the drug lag, making participation in phase I multiregional clinical trials (Ph. I MRCTs) an important consideration for oncology drug development in Japan. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the inclusion of Japan in Ph. I MRCTs in oncology.MethodsWe compared the trial design, target population, type of primary tested drug, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile for Ph. I MRCTs with or without Japan conducted by the top 20 companies in more than two countries and started between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020.ResultsOne hundred and ninety-seven Ph. I MRCTs included Japan, and 697 did not. Detailed features of the Ph. I MRCTs in oncology were summarized, and several factors (trial design, target population, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile) associated with inclusion of Japan in the Ph. I MRCTs were identified.ConclusionsIt is important for Japanese subsidiaries within global pharmaceutical companies to closely communicate with the headquarters based on medical practice and unmet needs in Japan to join global development from an early stage. In addition, further efforts to attract emerging biopharmaceutical companies to Japan from the regulatory and/or political perspectives would be needed, thereby preventing drug lag in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 772
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcome and survival of patients participating in oncology phase I trials
    Florescu, A.
    Chau, N. G.
    Chan, K. K.
    Wang, L.
    Chen, E. X.
    Oza, A. M.
    Siu, L. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [22] The prognosis of prognostic factors in phase I clinical trials
    Verweij, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (02) : 131 - 132
  • [23] THE ETHICAL APPROACH TO PHASE-I CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    DURRY, G
    DION, S
    [J]. DRUGS UNDER EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 12 (1-3) : 21 - 22
  • [24] Presentation and subsequent publication rates of Phase I oncology clinical trials
    Camacho, LH
    Bacik, J
    Cheung, A
    Spriggs, DR
    [J]. CANCER, 2005, 104 (07) : 1497 - 1504
  • [25] Bayesian optimal interval design for phase I oncology clinical trials
    Fellman, Bryan M.
    Yuan, Ying
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (01): : 110 - 120
  • [26] Factors associated with the successful completion of randomized clinical trials in gynecological oncology
    Swailes, A.
    Gupta, M.
    Chauhan, S. P.
    Kesterson, J.
    Wagner, S.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 154 : 127 - 127
  • [27] Phase 1 clinical trials in oncology
    Miller, MJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23): : 2452 - 2452
  • [28] Potential Factors Influencing Regional Differences and Similarities in Multiregional Clinical Trials
    Ohishi, Masahiko
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2012, 46 (05): : 565 - 572
  • [29] Potential Factors Influencing Regional Differences and Similarities in Multiregional Clinical Trials
    Masahiko Ohishi
    [J]. Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2012, 46 : 565 - 572
  • [30] Relationship between drug lag and factors associated with clinical trials in Japan
    Ohwaki, K.
    Nakabayashi, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 39 (06) : 649 - 652