Factors Associated with Inclusion of Japan in Phase I Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology

被引:0
|
作者
Maki, Akio [1 ]
Narukawa, Mamoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Clin Med Pharmaceut Med, 5-9-1 Shirokane,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1088641, Japan
关键词
Oncology; Phase I; Clinical trial; Drug development strategy; TRENDS; MEDICINE; FUTURE; LAG;
D O I
10.1007/s43441-024-00655-0
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundEarly inclusion of Japan in the global development program could be a key factor in reducing the drug lag, making participation in phase I multiregional clinical trials (Ph. I MRCTs) an important consideration for oncology drug development in Japan. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with the inclusion of Japan in Ph. I MRCTs in oncology.MethodsWe compared the trial design, target population, type of primary tested drug, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile for Ph. I MRCTs with or without Japan conducted by the top 20 companies in more than two countries and started between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020.ResultsOne hundred and ninety-seven Ph. I MRCTs included Japan, and 697 did not. Detailed features of the Ph. I MRCTs in oncology were summarized, and several factors (trial design, target population, trial conduct profile, and sponsor profile) associated with inclusion of Japan in the Ph. I MRCTs were identified.ConclusionsIt is important for Japanese subsidiaries within global pharmaceutical companies to closely communicate with the headquarters based on medical practice and unmet needs in Japan to join global development from an early stage. In addition, further efforts to attract emerging biopharmaceutical companies to Japan from the regulatory and/or political perspectives would be needed, thereby preventing drug lag in Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 772
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strategic inclusion of regions in multiregional clinical trials
    Song, Seung Yeon
    Chee, Deborah
    Kim, EunYoung
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 16 (01) : 98 - 105
  • [2] Phase I clinical trials in oncology
    Ganesan, Prasanth
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : 885 - 888
  • [3] Further evidence of clinical benefit associated with participation in phase I oncology trials
    Markman, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 98 (06) : 1021 - 1022
  • [4] Further evidence of clinical benefit associated with participation in phase I oncology trials
    M Markman
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2008, 98 : 1021 - 1022
  • [5] An Analysis of Japanese Patients Enrolled in Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology
    Hirakawa, Akihiro
    Kinoshita, Fumie
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2017, 51 (02) : 207 - 211
  • [6] An Analysis of Japanese Patients Enrolled in Multiregional Clinical Trials in Oncology
    Akihiro Hirakawa
    Fumie Kinoshita
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2017, 51 : 207 - 211
  • [7] Evaluation of Enrollment in Oncology Phase I Clinical Trials
    van der Biessen, A. J.
    Cranendonk, M. A.
    van der Holt, B.
    Verweij, J.
    de Jonge, M. J. A.
    Mathijssen, R. H. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S161 - S161
  • [8] Participation of women in phase I oncology clinical trials
    Vidal, L.
    Berg, R.
    Yang, Z.
    Moss, K. R.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [9] Increasing complexity in oncology phase I clinical trials
    Malik, Laeeq
    Lu, David
    [J]. INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2019, 37 (03) : 519 - 523
  • [10] Phase I clinical trials in oncology: Ethical issues
    Goldwasser, F
    [J]. THERAPIE, 2004, 59 (04): : 431 - 433