A COMPARISON BETWEEN ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ZINC SPECIMENS EXPOSED IN A RURAL ATMOSPHERE

被引:18
|
作者
ODNEVALL, I
LEYGRAF, C
机构
[1] Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Applied Electrochemistry and Corrosion Science, S-104 05, Stockholm, Rostagsvagen 101
关键词
D O I
10.1149/1.2085901
中图分类号
O646 [电化学、电解、磁化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this work is to explore the possible use of different methods for analyzing corroded zinc specimens exposed under sheltered and unsheltered conditions in a rural environment for 5 years. X-ray powder diffraction with a Guinier-Hagg camera showed the presence of (Zn, Cu)4SO4(OH)6.4H2O (naumwite) and SiO2 (low quartz) on the sheltered sample and Zn5(CO3)2(OH)6 (hydrozincite) on the unsheltered sample. Naumwite has not previously been reported as a corrosion product on zinc, whereas hydrozincite commonly occurs in different kinds of atmospheres. To provide further information a number of other methods were used for analysis of corrosion products on the same zinc specimens. The methods included in this work are: (i) x-ray powder diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectrometry and thermogravimetry for phase analysis, (ii) glow discharge optical spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy with x-ray microanalysis, x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and secondary ion mass spectroscopy for elemental analysis, and finally (iv) ion chromatography for analysis of water soluble anions. Among less-established analytical methods in the field of atmospheric corrosion this comparison shows that glow discharge optical spectroscopy and ion chromatography can provide valuable complementary information to more established methods such as x-ray powder diffraction and scanning electron microscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1923 / 1928
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Partial Sampling Methods in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Umar, S. A.
    Iremashvili, V.
    Pelaez, L.
    Yasir, S.
    Paluru, S.
    Lokeshwar, S.
    Manoharan, M.
    Soloway, M.
    Jorda, M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 247A - 247A
  • [42] A comparison of two sampling methods for radical prostatectomy specimens
    Gonzalez, A
    Fowler, M
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1997, 76 (01) : 437 - 437
  • [43] Comparison of methods for detection of vaccinia virus in patient specimens
    Fedorko, DP
    Preuss, JC
    Fahle, GA
    Li, L
    Fischer, SH
    Hohman, P
    Cohen, JI
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (09) : 4602 - 4606
  • [44] Solute interface segregation measurement: Cross comparison between four different analytical methods
    Hsu, C-Y
    Stodolna, J.
    Todeschini, P.
    Delabrouille, F.
    Barnier, V
    Radiguet, B.
    Christien, F.
    APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2022, 598
  • [45] COMPARISON OF METHODS AVAILABLE FOR ASSAY OF CHLORAMPHENICOL IN CLINICAL SPECIMENS
    DELOUVOIS, J
    MULHALL, A
    HURLEY, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1980, 33 (06) : 575 - 580
  • [46] Comparison between two analytical methods for determining lignin concentration of some grass forages
    Fukushima, RS
    Rosa, AJD
    de Lima, CG
    da Cunha, JA
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 1999, 34 (06) : 1025 - 1030
  • [47] Analysis of permeability based on petrophysical logs: comparison between heuristic numerical and analytical methods
    H. Heydari Gholanlo
    Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2021, 11 : 2097 - 2111
  • [48] Comparison between Analytical Equation and Numerical Methods for Determining Shear Stress in a Cantilever Beam
    Al-Qasem, Imad
    Hasan, A. Rasem
    Abdulwahid, Mohanad Y.
    Galobardes, Isaac
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2018, 4 (02): : 258 - 265
  • [49] Analysis of permeability based on petrophysical logs: comparison between heuristic numerical and analytical methods
    Gholanlo, H. Heydari
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 11 (05) : 2097 - 2111
  • [50] COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS OF TRAINING WEAVERS IN THE EGYPTIAN TEXTILE INDUSTRY.
    El-Sayed, I.H.M.
    Quality assurance London, 1985, 11 (01): : 19 - 20