Treatment of febrile neutropenia: filgrastim and pegfilgrastim

被引:0
|
作者
Franco-Trigo, Lucia [1 ]
Angel Calleja-Hernandez, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Garcia-Corpas, Jose P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Grp Invest & Atenc Farm CTS 131, Granada, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Serv Farm, Granada, Spain
关键词
Colony-Stimulating Factors TU; Filgrastim; Neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the therapeutic setting of febrile neutropenia is still unknown with regard to the prophylaxis one. The aim of the present work was to collect the information about this therapeutic use found out in the studies performed since 2003. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched in May 2012. Eligibility included works published in English, French and Spanish from 2003 on. Studies that involved the therapeutic use of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia were sought. Reviews, meta-analysis and works published as abstracts were excluded. The search was completed by checking the reference lists from the selected studies. Results: One of them was performed in a hospital in the Lebanon, another one in a British hospital, another was a multi-centre study in Spain and the last one was performed in Australia through an electronic survey made to cancer specialists. In the Lebanon study, 59 out of 137 granulocyte colonystimulating factors treatment courses were performed in the therapeutic setting. In the LEARN study in Spain 29.7% patients treated with daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors used them as treatment, so did 17.3% patients receiving pegfilgrastim. 9.7% treatments with filgrastim were therapeutic in the British hospital. Finally, in Australia 27% haematologist would use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in case 1 (low risk of medical complications). 7% oncologists would use them in their low risk case of medical complications and 9% would use them in case 2 (higher risk). The mean duration of the therapy in the different studies ranged between 4.8 and 6 days. The most frequent adverse effect was bone pain. Conclusions: The results from the present review showed that daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used more than pegfilgrastim in the treatment setting, being the latter used very little and even considered an exception. Therapies were short and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 7
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Frequency of febrile neutropenia in patients treated with taxane/epirubicine and colony-stimulating growth factors for breast cancer: comparison of filgrastim/lenograstim with pegfilgrastim
    Schippinger, W.
    Holub, R.
    Dandachi, N.
    Bauernhofer, T.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (01)
  • [32] Frequency of febrile neutropenia in patients treated with taxane/epirubicine and colony-stimulating growth factors for breast cancer: comparison of filgrastim/lenograstim with pegfilgrastim
    W Schippinger
    R Holub
    N Dandachi
    T Bauernhofer
    Breast Cancer Research, 9
  • [33] Incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is not altered by the day of administration of pegfilgrastim (PEG)
    Athar, U.
    Rajan, A.
    Gajra, A.
    Lynch, T. P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [34] Prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim in Italy: a budget impact analysis
    Rosti, Giovanni
    Lebboroni, Maria
    Cerchiari, Ario
    Katz, Pablo
    FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2011, 12 (03) : 119 - 127
  • [35] PEGFILGRASTIM ADMINISTRATION TIMING AND ITS EFFECT ON FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS
    Mack, Joana
    Spray, Beverly
    Mack, Delanie
    Mason, Katherine
    Becton, David
    Bielamowicz, Kevin
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2019, 66
  • [36] Cost simulation for the US of febrile neutropenia hospitalization due to pegfilgrastim on-body injector failure compared to single-injection pegfilgrastim and daily injections with reference and biosimilar filgrastim in lung cancer
    McBride, A.
    Krendyukov, A.
    Mathieson, N.
    Campbell, K.
    Balu, S.
    MacDonald, K.
    Abraham, I.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29
  • [37] PEGFILGRASTIM VERSUS FILGRASTIM IN THE MANAGEMENT OF THERAPY RELATED NEUTROPENIA IN RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA IN TREATMENT WITH POMALIDOMIDE-DEXAMETHASONE
    Cerchione, C.
    Nappi, D.
    Pareto, A. E.
    Picardi, M.
    Pane, F.
    Catalano, L.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2018, 103 : S129 - S129
  • [38] Frequency of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving epirubicin and docetaxel/paclitaxel with colony-stimulating growth factors: A comparison of filgrastim or lenograstim with pegfilgrastim
    Schippinger, Walter
    Holub, Robert
    Dandachi, Nadia
    Bauernhofer, Thomas
    Samonigg, Hellmut
    ONCOLOGY, 2006, 70 (04) : 290 - 293
  • [39] Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Filgrastim Versus a Filgrastim Biosimilar and Febrile Neutropenia-Associated Costs Among Patients with Nonmyeloid Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy
    Schwartzberg, Lee S.
    Lal, Lincy S.
    Balu, Sanjeev
    Campbell, Kim
    Brekke, Lee
    DeLeon, Andrew
    Elliott, Caitlin
    Korrer, Stephanie
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2018, 24 (10): : 976 - 984
  • [40] PEGFILGRASTIM AS PROPHYLAXIS OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA DURING CHEMOTHERAPY OF RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Cerchione, C.
    Pugliese, N.
    Marano, L.
    Cerciello, G.
    Avilia, S.
    Pane, F.
    Catalano, L.
    HAEMATOLOGICA, 2013, 98 : 424 - 424