Treatment of febrile neutropenia: filgrastim and pegfilgrastim

被引:0
|
作者
Franco-Trigo, Lucia [1 ]
Angel Calleja-Hernandez, Miguel [1 ,2 ]
Garcia-Corpas, Jose P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Grp Invest & Atenc Farm CTS 131, Granada, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Virgen Nieves, Serv Farm, Granada, Spain
关键词
Colony-Stimulating Factors TU; Filgrastim; Neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the therapeutic setting of febrile neutropenia is still unknown with regard to the prophylaxis one. The aim of the present work was to collect the information about this therapeutic use found out in the studies performed since 2003. Methods: Seven electronic databases were searched in May 2012. Eligibility included works published in English, French and Spanish from 2003 on. Studies that involved the therapeutic use of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia were sought. Reviews, meta-analysis and works published as abstracts were excluded. The search was completed by checking the reference lists from the selected studies. Results: One of them was performed in a hospital in the Lebanon, another one in a British hospital, another was a multi-centre study in Spain and the last one was performed in Australia through an electronic survey made to cancer specialists. In the Lebanon study, 59 out of 137 granulocyte colonystimulating factors treatment courses were performed in the therapeutic setting. In the LEARN study in Spain 29.7% patients treated with daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors used them as treatment, so did 17.3% patients receiving pegfilgrastim. 9.7% treatments with filgrastim were therapeutic in the British hospital. Finally, in Australia 27% haematologist would use granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in case 1 (low risk of medical complications). 7% oncologists would use them in their low risk case of medical complications and 9% would use them in case 2 (higher risk). The mean duration of the therapy in the different studies ranged between 4.8 and 6 days. The most frequent adverse effect was bone pain. Conclusions: The results from the present review showed that daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used more than pegfilgrastim in the treatment setting, being the latter used very little and even considered an exception. Therapies were short and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 7
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study on the effects of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in the treatment of fever and neutropenia in patients with leukemia in the west of Iran
    Golpayegani, Mohammad Reza
    Faranoush, Pooya
    Rasouli, Mohammad Hossein
    Foroughi-Gilvaee, Mohammadreza
    Sadighnia, Negin
    Zandi, Ashkan
    Mosavi-Kiasary, Seyedmohammad Sadegh
    Faranoush, Mohammad
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12 (02) : 76 - 85
  • [22] Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review
    Gebremariam, Girma Tekle
    Fentie, Atalay Mulu
    Beyene, Kebede
    Sander, Beate
    Gebretekle, Gebremedhin Beedemariam
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [23] Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim for prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with lymphoma: a systematic review
    Girma Tekle Gebremariam
    Atalay Mulu Fentie
    Kebede Beyene
    Beate Sander
    Gebremedhin Beedemariam Gebretekle
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [24] Filgrastim for treatment of neutropenia in a neonate
    Berndt, EM
    Stavris, MA
    Hanna, M
    Allen, P
    Kulick, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 1999, 56 (10) : 995 - 997
  • [25] Cost-Effectiveness of Filgrastim and Pegfilgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis against Febrile Neutropenia in Lymphoma Patients Receiving R-CHOP Chemotherapy
    Lathia, Nina
    Isogai, Pierre K.
    Walker, Scott
    Cheung, Matthew C.
    Krahn, Murray
    DeAngelis, Carlo
    Mittmann, Nicole
    BLOOD, 2009, 114 (22) : 976 - 976
  • [26] A single dose of pegfilgrastim reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in various risk strata compared with daily filgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Shogan, JE
    Koelbl, H
    Holmes, FA
    Liang, B
    Hackett, J
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 76 : S134 - S134
  • [27] Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy
    Kataoka, Tatsuo
    Sakurashita, Hiroshi
    Taogoshi, Takanori
    Nishigakiuchi, Ryo
    Murase, Tetsuya
    Izumitani, Satoru
    Saeki, Yasuyuki
    Matsuo, Hiroaki
    YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2019, 139 (04): : 629 - 633
  • [28] Pegfilgrastim vs filgrastim in primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer after chemotherapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis for Germany
    Sehouli, J.
    Goertz, A.
    Steinle, T.
    Dubois, R.
    Plesnila-Frank, C.
    Lalla, A.
    von Minckwitz, G.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (09) : 385 - 389
  • [29] Budget Saving Potential of Pegfilgrastim Biosimilar for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia, in Italy
    Berto, Patrizia
    Bellone, Marco
    Sabinot, Alice
    Pinto, Carmine
    Martino, Massimo
    Generali, Daniele
    Carriero, Pier Luigi
    Sanna, Maria Domenica
    FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2022, 23 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [30] Primary prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia with pegfilgrastim is more cost-effective than filgrastim in women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy in Germany
    Goertz, A.
    Dubois, R.
    Doan, Q., V
    Liu, Z.
    Heissel, A.
    Von Minckwitz, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A300 - A300