Comparison of Procedural Sedation for the Reduction of Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:15
|
作者
dela Cruz, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Sullivan, Donald N. [2 ]
Varboncouer, Eric [2 ]
Milbrandt, Joseph C. [3 ]
Duong, Myto [1 ]
Burdette, Scott [1 ]
O'Keefe, Daniel [1 ]
Scaife, Steven L. [3 ]
Saleh, Khaled J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Med, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
[3] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Clin Res Ctr, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
关键词
Arthroplasty; Dislocation; Emergency Medicine; Hip; Orthopedics; Reduction; Sedation;
D O I
10.5811/westjem.2013.7.15616
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Various types of sedation can be used for the reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty. Traditionally, an opiate/benzodiazepine combination has been employed. The use of other pharmacologic agents, such as etomidate and propofol, have more recently gained popularity. Currently no studies directly comparing these sedation agents have been carried out. The purpose of this study is to compare differences in reduction and sedation outcomes, including recovery times, of these 3 sedation agents. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review examining 198 patients who presented with dislocated total hip arthroplasty at 2 academic affiliated medical centers. The patients were grouped according to the type of sedation agent. We calculated percentages of reduction and sedation complications along with recovery times. Reduction complications included fracture, skin or neurovascular injury, and failure of reduction requiring general anesthesia. Sedation complications included use of bag-valve mask and artificial airway, intubation, prolonged recovery, use of a reversal agent, and inability to achieve sedation. We then compared the data for each sedation agent. Results: We found reduction complications rates of 8.7% in the propofol, 24.7% in the etomidate, and 28.9% in the opiate/benzodiazepine groups. The propofol group was significantly different from the other 2agents (p <= 0.01). Sedation complications were found 7.3% of the time in the propofol, 11.7% in the etomidate, and 21.3% in the opiate/benzodiazepine group, (p = 0.02 propofol vs. others). Average recovery times were 25.2 minutes for propofol, 30.8 minutes for etomidate, and 44.4 minutes for opiate/benzodiazepine (p = 0.05 for propofol vs. other agents). Conclusion: For reduction of dislocated total hip arthroplasty under procedural sedation, propofol appears to have fewer complications and a trend toward more rapid recovery than both etomidate and opiate/benzodiazepine. These data support the use of propofol as first line agent for procedural sedation of dislocated total hip arthroplasty, with fewer complications and a shorter recovery period.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Door to relocation time for dislocated hip prosthesis: multicentre comparison of emergency department procedural sedation versus theatre-based general anaesthesia
    Gagg, J.
    Jones, L.
    Shingler, G.
    Bothma, N.
    Simpkins, H.
    Gill, S.
    Benger, J.
    Lloyd, G.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (01) : 39 - 40
  • [32] Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty With Transverse Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy for Crowe Group IV Dislocated Hip
    Kawai, Toshiyuki
    Tanaka, Chiaki
    Ikenaga, Minoru
    Kanoe, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (02): : 229 - 235
  • [33] Intraarticular lidocaine versus intravenous procedural sedation with narcotics and benzodiazepines for reduction of the dislocated shoulder: A systematic review
    Fitch, Robert Warne
    Kuhn, John E.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (08) : 703 - 708
  • [34] Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Two Types of Failed Hip Preserving Procedures with Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Zuo, Wei
    Ma, Jin-hui
    Cui, Wei
    Guo, Wan-shou
    Sun, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2020, 12 (01) : 162 - 169
  • [35] Drain entrapment and titanium to ceramic head deposition - Two unique complications following closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty
    Luchetti, WT
    Copley, LA
    Vresilovic, EJ
    Black, J
    Steinberg, ME
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (06): : 713 - 717
  • [36] Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Current Approaches
    Krismer, Martin
    EUROPEAN INSTRUCTIONAL LECTURES, VOL 9, 2009, 2009, 9 : 163 - 175
  • [37] Bone loss at hip resurfacing: A comparison with total hip arthroplasty
    Crawford, JR
    Palmer, SJ
    Wimhurst, JA
    Villar, RN
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 15 (04) : 195 - 198
  • [38] Comparison of functional activity of hip resurfacing with total hip arthroplasty
    Witt, J. D.
    Kannan, V.
    White, T.
    BIOCERAMICS AND ALTERNATIVE BEARINGS IN JOINT ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, : 51 - +
  • [39] MY EXPERIENCE WITH THE CAPSULAR ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE DISLOCATED HIP
    COLONNA, PC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1956, 38 (01): : 230 - 230
  • [40] INTERPOSED SOFT-TISSUE OBSTRUCTING THE REDUCTION OF A DISLOCATED CHARNLEY HIP-ARTHROPLASTY
    SOUDRY, M
    JUHN, A
    MENDES, DG
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1985, 8 (03) : 389 - 390