Comparison of Procedural Sedation for the Reduction of Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:15
|
作者
dela Cruz, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Sullivan, Donald N. [2 ]
Varboncouer, Eric [2 ]
Milbrandt, Joseph C. [3 ]
Duong, Myto [1 ]
Burdette, Scott [1 ]
O'Keefe, Daniel [1 ]
Scaife, Steven L. [3 ]
Saleh, Khaled J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Emergency Med, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
[2] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
[3] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Clin Res Ctr, Springfield, IL 62794 USA
关键词
Arthroplasty; Dislocation; Emergency Medicine; Hip; Orthopedics; Reduction; Sedation;
D O I
10.5811/westjem.2013.7.15616
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Various types of sedation can be used for the reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty. Traditionally, an opiate/benzodiazepine combination has been employed. The use of other pharmacologic agents, such as etomidate and propofol, have more recently gained popularity. Currently no studies directly comparing these sedation agents have been carried out. The purpose of this study is to compare differences in reduction and sedation outcomes, including recovery times, of these 3 sedation agents. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review examining 198 patients who presented with dislocated total hip arthroplasty at 2 academic affiliated medical centers. The patients were grouped according to the type of sedation agent. We calculated percentages of reduction and sedation complications along with recovery times. Reduction complications included fracture, skin or neurovascular injury, and failure of reduction requiring general anesthesia. Sedation complications included use of bag-valve mask and artificial airway, intubation, prolonged recovery, use of a reversal agent, and inability to achieve sedation. We then compared the data for each sedation agent. Results: We found reduction complications rates of 8.7% in the propofol, 24.7% in the etomidate, and 28.9% in the opiate/benzodiazepine groups. The propofol group was significantly different from the other 2agents (p <= 0.01). Sedation complications were found 7.3% of the time in the propofol, 11.7% in the etomidate, and 21.3% in the opiate/benzodiazepine group, (p = 0.02 propofol vs. others). Average recovery times were 25.2 minutes for propofol, 30.8 minutes for etomidate, and 44.4 minutes for opiate/benzodiazepine (p = 0.05 for propofol vs. other agents). Conclusion: For reduction of dislocated total hip arthroplasty under procedural sedation, propofol appears to have fewer complications and a trend toward more rapid recovery than both etomidate and opiate/benzodiazepine. These data support the use of propofol as first line agent for procedural sedation of dislocated total hip arthroplasty, with fewer complications and a shorter recovery period.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 80
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Entrapment of the Sciatic Nerve Over the Femoral Neck Stem After Closed Reduction of a Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Maeder, Benoit
    Goetti, Patrick
    Mahlouly, Jaad
    Mustaki, Laurent
    Buchegger, Thomas
    Guyen, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2019, 3 (02):
  • [22] Displacement of a cemented polished tapered stem during closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty - a case report
    Petracchi, M
    Della Valle, AG
    Buttaro, M
    Piccaluga, F
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 73 (04): : 475 - 477
  • [23] Dexmedetomidine Sedation in an Old Patient for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Hong, Seung Hwan
    Kim, Gunn Hee
    Kil, Ho Young
    Kim, Mi Rum
    ANNALS OF GERIATRIC MEDICINE AND RESEARCH, 2012, 16 (01): : 39 - 42
  • [24] Remifentanil versus Propofol/Fentanyl Combination in Procedural Sedation for Dislocated Shoulder Reduction; a Clinical Trial
    Kasmaee, Vahid Monsef
    Zibari, Seyed Mandi Zia
    Nargesi, Marjan Aghajani
    ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (01)
  • [25] A Comparison of Total Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients and Outcomes
    Fowble, Vincent A.
    dela Rosa, Mylene A.
    Schmalzried, Thomas P.
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2009, 67 (02): : 108 - 112
  • [26] Closed reduction of constrained total hip arthroplasty
    Harman, MK
    Hodge, WA
    Banks, SA
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (414) : 121 - 128
  • [27] Reduction of dislocated hip prosthesis in the emergency department using conscious sedation: a prospective study
    Frymann, SJ
    Cumberbatch, GLA
    Stearman, ASL
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2005, 22 (11) : 807 - 809
  • [28] Surgical reduction of the dislocated hip
    Pedley, B
    WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR BUIATRICS - XIX CONGRESS, VOLS 1-3: VOLS 1-2: PROCEEDINGS; VOL 3: POSTER PRESENTATION, 1996, : 690 - 692
  • [29] Closed Reduction of a Dislocated Constrained Total Hip Arthroplasty With 2-year Follow-up: A Case Report
    Tkach, Shaun D.
    V. DeMaio, Christian
    Domingue, Grayson A.
    Thakral, Rishi
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 22
  • [30] REDUCTION OF UNREDUCIBLE DISLOCATED HIP
    ASHLEY, RK
    LARSON, LJ
    JAMES, PH
    CALLENDE.JN
    SUTHERLA.DH
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1971, A 53 (02): : 385 - &