Researchers' experiences with and perceptions of returning results to participants: Study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
McElfish, Pearl A. [1 ]
Purvis, Rachel S. [2 ]
Long, Christopher R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci Northwest, Coll Med, 1125 N Coll Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci Northwest, Off Community Hlth & Res, 1125 N Coll Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dissemination; Research results; Health research; Research participants;
D O I
10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.005
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Health research participants want to receive the results from research studies in which they have participated, and health research funding agencies encourage the returning of results to research participants. However, researchers rarely return results to research participants. This study protocol aims to fill the significant gap in knowledge that exists regarding experiences, perceptions, and challenges health researchers have with returning results to research participants. Design: The study will use a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation design that will collect qualitative and quantitative data in one simultaneous phase to allow researchers to utilize each type of data to corroborate the findings from the other. The research team developed a mixed-methods survey to assess the experiences, perceptions, and challenges health researchers have with returning results to research participants. Method: The survey includes both quantitative and qualitative (open-ended) questions and will be implemented online and will take approximately 10-15 min for respondents to complete. The survey is divided into four topics areas, which include respondents': 1) general opinion of returning results to participants in health research studies, 2) experiences with a specific study in which they did not return results to participants, 3) perceptions of specific challenges they face in returning results to participants, and 4) demographic characteristics and professional background information. Summary: The study to be conducted will address knowledge gaps related to researchers' experiences, perceptions, and challenges with returning research results. The study is an important step toward pragmatic solutions that can improve researchers' ability to return results to participants.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 98
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RETURNING INDIVIDUAL RESEARCH RESULTS TO PARTICIPANTS: GUIDANCE FOR A NEW RESEARCH PARADIGM
    Bylander, Jessica
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (03) : 509 - 510
  • [32] Returning Pleiotropic Results From Genetic Testing to Patients and Research Participants
    Kocarnik, Jonathan M.
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (08): : 795 - 796
  • [33] Researchers' views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study
    Xu, Antonia
    Baysari, Melissa Therese
    Stocker, Sophie Lena
    Leow, Liang Joo
    Day, Richard Osborne
    Carland, Jane Ellen
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [34] Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS)
    Ashley Crook
    Loren Plunkett
    Laura E Forrest
    Nina Hallowell
    Samantha Wake
    Kathryn Alsop
    Margaret Gleeson
    David Bowtell
    Gillian Mitchell
    Mary-Anne Young
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2015, 23 : 152 - 158
  • [35] Researchers’ views on, and experiences with, the requirement to obtain informed consent in research involving human participants: a qualitative study
    Antonia Xu
    Melissa Therese Baysari
    Sophie Lena Stocker
    Liang Joo Leow
    Richard Osborne Day
    Jane Ellen Carland
    BMC Medical Ethics, 21
  • [36] Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS)
    Crook, Ashley
    Plunkett, Loren
    Forrest, Laura E.
    Hallowell, Nina
    Wake, Samantha
    Alsop, Kathryn
    Gleeson, Margaret
    Bowtell, David
    Mitchell, Gillian
    Young, Mary-Anne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (02) : 152 - 158
  • [37] Responsiveness of researchers is as important as responsiveness of study participants
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Tugwell, Peter
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 68 (12) : 1385 - 1387
  • [38] Considerations for Returning Research Results to Culturally Diverse Participants and Families of Decedents
    Garrison, Nanibaa'A.
    JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2015, 43 (03): : 569 - 575
  • [39] Study participants' perceptions of the process and impact of receiving results of N9831.
    Partridge, A. H.
    Wolff, A. C.
    Marcom, P. K.
    Kaufman, P. A.
    Moore, C.
    Lake, D.
    Fleming, G.
    Rugo, H. S.
    Collyar, D.
    Winer, E. P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (18) : 7S - 7S
  • [40] Exploring Perceptions and Experiences of Bolivian Health Researchers With Research Ethics
    Sullivan, Sarah
    Aalborg, Annette
    Basagoitia, Armando
    Cortes, Jacqueline
    Lanza, Oscar
    Schwind, Jessica S.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2015, 10 (02) : 185 - 195