Researchers' experiences with and perceptions of returning results to participants: Study protocol

被引:9
|
作者
McElfish, Pearl A. [1 ]
Purvis, Rachel S. [2 ]
Long, Christopher R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci Northwest, Coll Med, 1125 N Coll Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas Med Sci Northwest, Off Community Hlth & Res, 1125 N Coll Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Dissemination; Research results; Health research; Research participants;
D O I
10.1016/j.conctc.2018.06.005
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Health research participants want to receive the results from research studies in which they have participated, and health research funding agencies encourage the returning of results to research participants. However, researchers rarely return results to research participants. This study protocol aims to fill the significant gap in knowledge that exists regarding experiences, perceptions, and challenges health researchers have with returning results to research participants. Design: The study will use a mixed-methods concurrent triangulation design that will collect qualitative and quantitative data in one simultaneous phase to allow researchers to utilize each type of data to corroborate the findings from the other. The research team developed a mixed-methods survey to assess the experiences, perceptions, and challenges health researchers have with returning results to research participants. Method: The survey includes both quantitative and qualitative (open-ended) questions and will be implemented online and will take approximately 10-15 min for respondents to complete. The survey is divided into four topics areas, which include respondents': 1) general opinion of returning results to participants in health research studies, 2) experiences with a specific study in which they did not return results to participants, 3) perceptions of specific challenges they face in returning results to participants, and 4) demographic characteristics and professional background information. Summary: The study to be conducted will address knowledge gaps related to researchers' experiences, perceptions, and challenges with returning research results. The study is an important step toward pragmatic solutions that can improve researchers' ability to return results to participants.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 98
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical providers’ experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study
    Julia Wynn
    Katie Lewis
    Laura M. Amendola
    Barbara A. Bernhardt
    Sawona Biswas
    Manasi Joshi
    Carmit McMullen
    Sarah Scollon
    BMC Medical Genomics, 11
  • [22] Researchers' Perceptions and Experiences with an Open Access Subvention Fund
    Doney, Jylisa
    Kenyon, Jeremy
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2022, 17 (01): : 56 - 77
  • [23] Community Experiences and Perceptions of Clinical and Translational Research and Researchers
    Skinner, Jeannine S.
    Williams, Neely A.
    Richmond, Al
    Brown, Jen
    Strelnick, A. Hal
    Calhoun, Karen
    De Loney, E. Hill
    Allen, Shauntice
    Pirie, Alex
    Wilkins, Consuelo H.
    PROGRESS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS-RESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACTION, 2018, 12 (03) : 263 - 271
  • [24] Australian researchers ' perceptions and experiences with stem cell registration
    Hu, Mengqi
    Santos, Dan
    Lopes, Edilene
    Nicol, Dianne
    Kurtz, Andreas
    Mah, Nancy
    Muller, Sabine
    Ankeny, Rachel A.
    Wells, Christine A.
    STEM CELL RESEARCH, 2024, 79
  • [25] Returning incidentally discovered Hepatitis C RNA-seq results to COPDGene study participants
    Silverman, Edwin K.
    Kim, Arthur Y.
    Make, Barry J.
    Regan, Elizabeth A.
    Morrow, Jarrett D.
    Hersh, Craig P.
    O'Brien, James
    Crapo, James D.
    Hansel, Nadia N.
    Criner, Gerard
    Flenaugh, Eric L.
    Conrad, Douglas
    Casaburi, Richard
    Bowler, Russell P.
    Hanania, Nicola A.
    Barr, R. Graham
    Bhatt, Surya P.
    Sciurba, Frank C.
    Anzueto, Antonio
    Han, MeiLan K.
    Mcevoy, Charlene E.
    Comellas, Alejandro P.
    Demeo, Dawn L.
    Rosiello, Richard
    Curtis, Jeffrey L.
    Uchida, Tricia
    Wilson, Carla
    O'Rourke, P. Pearl
    NPJ GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [26] Returning Individual Tap Water Testing Results to Research Study Participants after a Wildfire Disaster
    Von Behren, Julie
    Wong, Michelle
    Morales, Daniela
    Reynolds, Peggy
    English, Paul B.
    Solomon, Gina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (02)
  • [27] Returning incidentally discovered Hepatitis C RNA-seq results to COPDGene study participants
    Edwin K. Silverman
    Arthur Y. Kim
    Barry J. Make
    Elizabeth A. Regan
    Jarrett D. Morrow
    Craig P. Hersh
    James O’Brien
    James D. Crapo
    Nadia N. Hansel
    Gerard Criner
    Eric L. Flenaugh
    Douglas Conrad
    Richard Casaburi
    Russell P. Bowler
    Nicola A. Hanania
    R. Graham Barr
    Surya P. Bhatt
    Frank C. Sciurba
    Antonio Anzueto
    MeiLan K. Han
    Charlene E. McEvoy
    Alejandro P. Comellas
    Dawn L. DeMeo
    Richard Rosiello
    Jeffrey L. Curtis
    Tricia Uchida
    Carla Wilson
    P. Pearl O’Rourke
    npj Genomic Medicine, 8
  • [28] Sharing research results with research participants: experiences from the TeleYoga study
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    Stromberg, Anna
    TeleYoga Team
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2025, 24 (01) : 176 - 177
  • [29] Assessing Research Participants' Perceptions of their Clinical Research Experiences
    Kost, Rhonda G.
    Lee, Laura M.
    Yessis, Jennifer
    Coller, Barry S.
    Henderson, David K.
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 4 (06): : 403 - 413
  • [30] Scientific misconduct: A cross-sectional study of the perceptions, attitudes and experiences of Spanish researchers
    Candal-Pedreira, Cristina
    Ghaddar, Ali
    Perez-Rios, Monica
    Varela-Lema, Leonor
    Alvarez-Dardet, Carlos
    Ruano-Ravina, Alberto
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2025, 32 (03): : 393 - 416