The challenges of implementing ADHD clinical guidelines and research best evidence in routine clinical care settings: Delphi survey and mixed-methods study

被引:15
|
作者
Hall, Charlotte L. [1 ]
Taylor, John A. [1 ]
Newell, Karen [1 ]
Baldwin, Laurence [2 ]
Sayal, Kapil [3 ]
Hollis, Chris [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
[2] Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Fdn Trust, Bakewell, Derby, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Dev Psychiat, Queens Med Ctr, Nottingham, England
来源
BJPSYCH OPEN | 2016年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002386
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background The landmark US Multimodal Treatment of ADHD (MTA) study established the benefits of individualised medication titration and optimisation strategies to improve short-to medium-term outcomes in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This individualised medication management approach was subsequently incorporated into the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ADHD Clinical Guidelines (NICE CG78). However, little is known about clinicians' attitudes towards implementing these medication management strategies for ADHD in routine care. Aims To examine National Health Service (NHS) healthcare professionals' consensus on ADHD medication management strategies. Method Using the Delphi method, we examined perceptions on the importance and feasibility of implementing 103 ADHD treatment statements from sources including the UK NICE ADHD guidelines and US medication management algorithms. Results Certain recommendations for ADHD medication management were judged as important and feasible to implement, including a stepwise titration of stimulant medication. Other recommendations were perceived as important but not feasible to implement in routine practice, such as weekly clinic follow-up with the family during titration and collection of follow-up symptom questionnaires. Conclusions Many of the key guideline recommendations for ADHD medication management are viewed by clinicians as important and feasible to implement. However, some recommendations present significant implementation challenges within the context of routine NHS clinical care in England. Declaration of interest C.H. and K.S. were members of the Guideline Development Group for the NICE ADHD Clinical Guideline (NICE CG78). Copyright and usage (C) 2016 The Royal College of Psychiatrists.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 31
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global trends in oncology research: A mixed-methods study of publications and clinical trials from 2010 to 2019
    Akiki, Vincent
    Troussard, Xavier
    Metges, Jean-Philippe
    Devos, Patrick
    [J]. CANCER REPORTS, 2023, 6 (01)
  • [42] Knowledge, practices and challenges related to implementing breast cancer survivorship guidelines in the primary care setting: results of a mixed methods study
    Luctkar-Flude, Marian
    Aiken, Alice
    McColl, Mary Ann
    Tranmer, Joan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 11 - 12
  • [43] Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults' mental health services: a mixed-methods study
    Robotham, Dan
    Evans, Joanne
    Watson, Andrew
    Perdue, Iain
    Craig, Thomas
    Rose, Diana
    Wykes, Til
    [J]. ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2015, 7
  • [44] Linking a research register to clinical records in older adults’ mental health services: a mixed-methods study
    Dan Robotham
    Joanne Evans
    Andrew Watson
    Iain Perdue
    Thomas Craig
    Diana Rose
    Til Wykes
    [J]. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, 7
  • [45] Acceptance of mobile application-based clinical guidelines among health professionals in Northwestern Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study
    Baykemagn, Nebebe Demis
    Nigatu, Araya Mesfin
    Fikadie, Berhanu
    Tilahun, Binyam
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 10
  • [46] An Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for the Assessment and Management of Suicidality in Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study
    Horrocks, Matthew
    Michail, Maria
    Aubeeluck, Aimee
    Wright, Nicola
    Morriss, Richard
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2018, 7 (12):
  • [47] Mixed-methods study of reported clinical cases of undesirable events, medical errors, and near misses in health care
    Dimova, Rositsa
    Stoyanova, Rumyana
    Doykov, Ilian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (04) : 752 - 757
  • [48] Integrating Patient Involvement Interventions within Clinical Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study of Health Care Professional Reasoning
    Holm, Anna
    Rodkjaer, Lotte Orneborg
    Bekker, Hilary Louise
    [J]. MDM POLICY & PRACTICE, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [49] Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study
    Martinic, Marina Krnic
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    von Elm, Erik
    Herrle, Florian
    Marusic, Ana
    Puljak, Livia
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [50] Impact of harm reduction care in HIV clinical settings on stigma and health outcomes for people with HIV who use drugs: study protocol for a mixed-methods, multisite, observational study
    Kay, Emma Sophia
    Creasy, Stephanie
    Batey, D. Scott
    Coulter, Robert
    Egan, James E.
    Fisk, Stuart
    Friedman, Mackey Reuel
    Kinsky, Suzanne
    Krier, Sarah
    Noble, Victor
    Turan, Bulent
    Turan, Janet M.
    Yu, Lan
    Hawk, Mary
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):