Dialogue between European Court of Human Rigths and Spanish courts

被引：0

作者：

Lopez Guerra, Luis ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Carlos III, Juez Tribunal Europeo Derechos Humanos, Catedrat Derecho Constituc, Madrid, Spain

来源：

TEORIA Y REALIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL | 2013年 / 32卷

关键词：

Dialogue between courts; European Court of Human Rights; Spanish courts;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

The concept of "dialogue between courts" has been used with different meanings. In this article, and based on the case law of both the European Court of Human Rights and Spanish courts, "dialogue between courts" is understood as the reciprocal interrelations between courts of different legal orders, with practical consequences for their judgments, in view of the case law of the other courts. These consequences may range from offering citicisms or alternative solutions, to amending,, or even overruling their previous case law.

引用

页码：139 / 158

页数：20

共 50 条

[21] The special constitutional relevance as a conversational tool between the Spanish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights
Jimenez, Argelia Queralt
TEORIA Y REALIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL, 2024, 53
[22] The special constitutional relevance as a conversational tool between the Spanish Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights
Jimenez, Argelia queralt
TEORIA Y REALIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL, 2024, 53
[23] Dialogue St. Petersburg - Strasbourg: on the conflict between the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the European Court of Human Rights
van der Pol, R. A.
van der Pol, L., V
VESTNIK OF SAINT PETERSBURG UNIVERSITY-LAW-VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-PRAVO, 2019, 10 (04): : 781 - 795
[24] Expert Evidence Deficiencies in the Judgments of the Courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights
Kalintiri, Andriani
WORLD COMPETITION, 2014, 37 (04): : 601 - +
[25] Expert Evidence Deficiencies in the Judgments of the Courts of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights
Tracol, Xavier
COMMON MARKET LAW REVIEW, 2016, 53 (01): : 277 - 279
[26] Between Informal Dialogue and Official Criticism The Bundesverfassungsgericht, the Court of Justice of the European Union, and the European Court of Human Rights concerning the Protection of Human Rights and Mutual Recognition of Judgments
Podolska, Anna
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY LAW REVIEW, 2019, 21 (05) : 409 - 420
[27] Dialogue between courts and the protection of human rights: dificultes and perspectives
Santos, Gustavo Ferreira
Allain Teixeira, Joao Paulo
Correa de Araujo, Marcelo Labanca
A&C-REVISTA DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO & CONSTITUCIONAL, 2016, 16 (66): : 267 - 282
[28] The European Court of Justice and National Courts
van Arendonk, Henk
EC TAX REVIEW, 2009, 18 (03): : 96 - 97
[29] Political Parties Act and the European Conventional test: The dialogue between the Constitutional Court and European Court of Human Rights about the outlawing of Batasuna and Herri Batasuna
Iglesias Barez, Mercedes
TEORIA Y REALIDAD CONSTITUCIONAL, 2010, 25 : 567 - 586
[30] The Legitimacy of Human Rights Courts: A Grounded Interpretivist Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights
Cali, Basak
Koch, Anne
Bruch, Nicola
HUMAN RIGHTS QUARTERLY, 2013, 35 (04) : 955 - 984

← 1 2 3 4 5 →