Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation in elective colorectal surgery: A prospective randomized study

被引:10
|
作者
Bhat, Altaf Hussain [1 ]
Parray, Fazl Qadir [1 ]
Chowdri, Nisar Ahmad [1 ]
Wani, Rauf Ahmad [1 ]
Thakur, Natasha [1 ]
Nazki, Saalim [1 ]
Wani, Imtiaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Sherikashmir Inst Med Sci, Colorectal Dept, Div Gen & Minimal Invas Surg, 4 Srinagar, Srinagar 190011, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijso.2016.02.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) of gut is routinely done before colorectal surgeries in most surgical departments all over the globe. This gut preparation is aimed at reducing the risk of postoperative infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Even though recent studies are more in favor of operating on gut without bowel preparation, controversies still exist. The aim of our study was to assess whether elective colorectal surgeries can be performed safely without preoperative MBP. Methods: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgeries were prospectively randomized into two groups with the help of random number table method; Group-1 had mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol (MBP group) before surgery, and Group-2 had no mechanical bowel preparation (NMBP group) before surgery. All patients in the study groups were followed up for at least 2 months after surgery for wound infection, anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal infections. Results: Two hundred fourteen patients were included in this hospital-based systematic prospective randomized trial: 104 patients in Group-1 and 98 patients in Group-2. Twelve patients were excluded from the study. The type of surgical procedure and type of anastomosis did not significantly differ between two groups. There was no difference in surgical infections between two groups. The overall infection rate was 39.4% in Group-1 and 32.6% in Group-2 (p = 0.31). Wound infection (p = 0.45), anastomotic leak (p = 0.45) and intra-abdominal/pelvic collection (p = 0.62) occurred in 3.8%, 3.8% and 6.7% versus 6.1%, 2% and 5.1% in Group-1 (MBP group) and Group-2 (NMBP group) respectively. Our results showed that MBP does not offer any specific benefit in elective colorectal surgeries but in real sense may add to some problems, which, however, did not achieve a statistical significance. Conclusions: Our study proved that no advantage is gained by pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery and can be easily avoided in order to save patients from unwanted exhaustion, distress and adverse effects related to it. It is actually the mindset that makes us to believe that MBP will reduce the incidence of infections rather than the evidence from literature. We conclude from our study that all types of elective colorectal surgeries can be performed safely without subjecting patients to mechanical bowel preparation before surgery. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 30
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Influence of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Elective Lower Colorectal Surgery Reply
    van't Sant, Hans Pieter
    Weidema, Wibo F.
    Hop, Wim C. J.
    Lange, Johan F.
    Contant, Caroline M. E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (03) : 575 - 576
  • [42] Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicentre randomised trial
    Contant, Caroline M. E.
    Hop, Wim C. J.
    van 't Sant, Hans Pieter
    Oostvogel, Henk J. M.
    Smeets, Harm J.
    Stassen, Laurents P. S.
    Neijenhuis, Peter A.
    Idenburg, Floris J.
    Dijkhuis, Cees M.
    Heres, Piet
    van Tets, Willem F.
    Gerritsen, Jos J. G. M.
    Weidema, Wibo F.
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 370 (9605): : 2112 - 2117
  • [43] Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery - A meta-analysis
    Bucher, P
    Mertmillod, B
    Gervaz, P
    Morel, P
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2004, 139 (12) : 1359 - 1364
  • [44] Bowel Preparation before elective colorectal Surgery
    Manekeller, Steffen
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2019, 144 (03):
  • [45] Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Colorectal Surgery
    Kolovrat, Marijan
    Busic, Zeljko
    Lovric, Zvonimir
    Amic, Fedor
    Cavka, Vlatka
    Boras, Zdenko
    Servis, Drazen
    Lemac, Domagoj
    Busic, Njegoslav
    [J]. COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2012, 36 (04) : 1343 - 1346
  • [46] The role of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective ileostomy closure: A randomized prospective study
    Singh, Amandeep
    Singh, Sarbjeet
    Saini, Girish
    Sinha, Shourabh
    Kaur, Haramritpal
    Singh, Sonam
    [J]. FORMOSAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 54 (04) : 124 - 129
  • [47] THE IMPACT OF MECHANICAL BOWEL PREPARATION IN ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY: A META-ANALYSIS
    Rollins, K. E.
    Javanmard-Emamghissi, H.
    Lobo, D. N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 105 : 9 - 9
  • [48] Mechanical bowel preparation and antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery in Switzerland—a survey
    Adrian Businger
    Gabriela Grunder
    Marc-Olivier Guenin
    Christoph Ackermann
    Ralph Peterli
    Markus von Flüe
    [J]. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 2011, 396 : 107 - 113
  • [49] Benefit of mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colorectal surgery: current insights
    Murray, A. C. A.
    Kiran, R. P.
    [J]. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2016, 401 (05) : 573 - 580
  • [50] impact of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis
    Rollins, Katie E.
    Javanmard-Emamghissi, Hannah
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 24 (04) : 519 - 536