Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation in elective colorectal surgery: A prospective randomized study

被引:10
|
作者
Bhat, Altaf Hussain [1 ]
Parray, Fazl Qadir [1 ]
Chowdri, Nisar Ahmad [1 ]
Wani, Rauf Ahmad [1 ]
Thakur, Natasha [1 ]
Nazki, Saalim [1 ]
Wani, Imtiaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Sherikashmir Inst Med Sci, Colorectal Dept, Div Gen & Minimal Invas Surg, 4 Srinagar, Srinagar 190011, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijso.2016.02.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) of gut is routinely done before colorectal surgeries in most surgical departments all over the globe. This gut preparation is aimed at reducing the risk of postoperative infections in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Even though recent studies are more in favor of operating on gut without bowel preparation, controversies still exist. The aim of our study was to assess whether elective colorectal surgeries can be performed safely without preoperative MBP. Methods: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgeries were prospectively randomized into two groups with the help of random number table method; Group-1 had mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol (MBP group) before surgery, and Group-2 had no mechanical bowel preparation (NMBP group) before surgery. All patients in the study groups were followed up for at least 2 months after surgery for wound infection, anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal infections. Results: Two hundred fourteen patients were included in this hospital-based systematic prospective randomized trial: 104 patients in Group-1 and 98 patients in Group-2. Twelve patients were excluded from the study. The type of surgical procedure and type of anastomosis did not significantly differ between two groups. There was no difference in surgical infections between two groups. The overall infection rate was 39.4% in Group-1 and 32.6% in Group-2 (p = 0.31). Wound infection (p = 0.45), anastomotic leak (p = 0.45) and intra-abdominal/pelvic collection (p = 0.62) occurred in 3.8%, 3.8% and 6.7% versus 6.1%, 2% and 5.1% in Group-1 (MBP group) and Group-2 (NMBP group) respectively. Our results showed that MBP does not offer any specific benefit in elective colorectal surgeries but in real sense may add to some problems, which, however, did not achieve a statistical significance. Conclusions: Our study proved that no advantage is gained by pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery and can be easily avoided in order to save patients from unwanted exhaustion, distress and adverse effects related to it. It is actually the mindset that makes us to believe that MBP will reduce the incidence of infections rather than the evidence from literature. We conclude from our study that all types of elective colorectal surgeries can be performed safely without subjecting patients to mechanical bowel preparation before surgery. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 30
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Open-Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Bowel Preparation vs Nonmechanical Bowel Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Personal Experience
    Bhattacharjee, Prosanta Kumar
    Chakraborty, Saibal
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S1233 - S1236
  • [22] An Open-Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Bowel Preparation vs Nonmechanical Bowel Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Personal Experience
    Prosanta Kumar Bhattacharjee
    Saibal Chakraborty
    [J]. Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 1233 - 1236
  • [23] The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
    van't Sant, H. P.
    Slieker, J. C.
    Hop, W. C. J.
    Weidema, W. F.
    Lange, J. F.
    Vermeulen, J.
    Contant, C. M. E.
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2012, 16 (04) : 309 - 314
  • [24] Mechanical bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery: is it necessary?
    A. Matsou
    G. Vrakas
    M. Doulgerakis
    K. Hatzimisios
    N. Zandes
    K. Saliangas
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2011, 15 : 59 - 62
  • [25] The Influence of Mechanical Bowel Preparation in Elective Lower Colorectal Surgery
    Brisinda, Giuseppe
    Vanella, Serafino
    Crocco, Anna
    Maria, Giorgio
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 252 (03) : 574 - 575
  • [26] Elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the era of mechanical bowel preparation
    Businger, Adrian
    Muller, Laurent
    Guenin, Marc-Olivier
    von Fluee, Markus
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (35-36) : 21S - 21S
  • [27] Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    Wilson, Samuel E.
    Awad, Samir S.
    Jensen, Erin H.
    Finn, Tyler S.
    Abramson, Murray A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (02): : 190 - 194
  • [28] Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: Is It Enough? Reply
    Peppas, George
    Alexiou, Vangelis G.
    Falagas, Matthew E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (07) : 1395 - 1395
  • [29] Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: Is It Enough? Reply
    George Peppas
    Vangelis G. Alexiou
    Matthew E. Falagas
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2009, 13 : 1395 - 1395
  • [30] The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery for diverticulitis
    H. P. van’t Sant
    J. C. Slieker
    W. C. J. Hop
    W. F. Weidema
    J. F. Lange
    J. Vermeulen
    C. M. E. Contant
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2012, 16 : 309 - 314