SAFETY, EFFICACY, COST, AND MORBIDITY OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 228 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS

被引:0
|
作者
KELLEY, JE [1 ]
BURRUS, RG [1 ]
BURNS, RP [1 ]
GRAHAM, LD [1 ]
CHANDLER, KE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA,ERLANGER MED CTR,COLL MED,DEPT SURG,CHATTANOOGA,TN 37401
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice in most hospitals for the resolution of surgically treatable gallbladder disease. Few reports address the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison to open cholecystectomy during the same time interval within the same institution. One hundred ninety-six laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed from April 1990 through February 1991. Initial patient selection was restricted to elective procedures for chronic cholecystitis with expanded indications as experience was gained. Of the 196 cases, 11 required conversion to open cholecystectomy, leaving 185 laparoscopic cholecystectomies for. comparison. During the same period, 82 open cholecystectomies were performed. Thirty-nine of these were complicated cases and would not have been considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy early in the study, leaving 43 routine open cholecystectomies for comparative purposes. In the laparoscopic group, 1.1 per cent of the patients had major operative complications as opposed to the open group, which had none. There were no common bile duct injuries in either group. To provide a true cost-benefit analysis, a group of patients was identified that would qualify for elective, same-day admission for either an open or laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed on 70 patients, and open cholecystectomy (OC) was performed on 26 patients. A comparison of data from these groups showed no significant difference in age or sex. Hospitalization costs averaged $5,390 for the LC group versus $5,392 for the OC group. Postoperative hospital stay averaged 1.3 days for the LC group versus 3.7 days for the OC group (P < 0.0001). The mean time of return to work and regular activities was 8.2 days for the LC group and 42.8 days for the OC group (P < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction was evaluated by an independent, postoperative, nonbiased phone interview at 6 weeks. In the LC group, 96 per cent were very satisfied and 4 per cent were satisfied. In the OC group, 14% were very satisfied, 67% were satisfied, and 19% were not satisfied. This study indicates that laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers significant advantages for patient recovery and satisfaction while providing a safe, cost-effective method for the treatment of gallbladder disease.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 27
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in diabetic patients and postoperative outcome
    Paajanen, Hannu
    Suuronen, Satu
    Nordstrom, Pia
    Miettinen, Pekka
    Niskanen, Leo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (03): : 764 - 770
  • [32] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy -: An analysis of clinical and financial aspects
    Schietroma, M
    Carlei, F
    Liakos, C
    Rossi, M
    Carloni, A
    Enang, GN
    Pistoia, MA
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2001, 43 (04) : 239 - 242
  • [33] Safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbid and super obese patients
    Tiong, Leong
    Oh, Jaewook
    HPB, 2015, 17 (07) : 600 - 604
  • [34] Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Pediatric Patients: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Babb, Jaqueline
    Davis, James
    Tashiro, Jun
    Perez, Eduardo A.
    Sola, Juan E.
    Pandya, Samir
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (03): : 322 - 327
  • [35] COST ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Bayrak, Omer
    Seckiner, Ilker
    Erturhan, Sakip Mehmet
    Cil, Gokhan
    Erbagci, Ahmet
    Yagci, Faruk
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A282 - A282
  • [36] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy - A Prospective comparative study in the elderly with acute cholecystitis
    Pessaux, P
    Regenet, N
    Tuech, JJ
    Rouge, C
    Bergamaschi, R
    Arnaud, JP
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2001, 11 (04): : 252 - 255
  • [37] THE COST OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL - INVITED COMMENTARY
    VOYLES, CR
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1995, 9 (03): : 324 - 324
  • [38] LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - INDICATIONS AND SAFETY OF THE METHOD BASED ON A CONSECUTIVE SERIES OF 300 PATIENTS
    NAVEZ, B
    GUIOT, P
    BOUTSEN, M
    REMY, P
    KRICK, M
    DELMARCHE, C
    ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE, 1992, 46 (07): : 610 - 614
  • [39] Open versus laparoscopic completion cholecystectomy in patients with previous open partial cholecystectomy: a retrospective comparative study
    Nafea, Mohammed A.
    Elshafey, Mohammed H.
    Hegab, Ahmed
    Seleem, Abdelhafez
    Rafat, Walid
    Khairy, Mostafa
    Elaskary, Hany
    Mohamed, Yumna Mahmoud
    Monazea, Khaled
    Salem, Abdoh
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 86 (10): : 5688 - 5695
  • [40] Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: outcomes analysis of 266 consecutive patients
    Dolce, Charles J.
    Keller, Jennifer E.
    Walters, K. Christian
    Griffin, Daniel
    Norton, H. James
    Heniford, B. Todd
    Kercher, Kent W.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (07): : 1564 - 1568