SAFETY, EFFICACY, COST, AND MORBIDITY OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 228 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS

被引:0
|
作者
KELLEY, JE [1 ]
BURRUS, RG [1 ]
BURNS, RP [1 ]
GRAHAM, LD [1 ]
CHANDLER, KE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA,ERLANGER MED CTR,COLL MED,DEPT SURG,CHATTANOOGA,TN 37401
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the procedure of choice in most hospitals for the resolution of surgically treatable gallbladder disease. Few reports address the results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison to open cholecystectomy during the same time interval within the same institution. One hundred ninety-six laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed from April 1990 through February 1991. Initial patient selection was restricted to elective procedures for chronic cholecystitis with expanded indications as experience was gained. Of the 196 cases, 11 required conversion to open cholecystectomy, leaving 185 laparoscopic cholecystectomies for. comparison. During the same period, 82 open cholecystectomies were performed. Thirty-nine of these were complicated cases and would not have been considered for laparoscopic cholecystectomy early in the study, leaving 43 routine open cholecystectomies for comparative purposes. In the laparoscopic group, 1.1 per cent of the patients had major operative complications as opposed to the open group, which had none. There were no common bile duct injuries in either group. To provide a true cost-benefit analysis, a group of patients was identified that would qualify for elective, same-day admission for either an open or laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was performed on 70 patients, and open cholecystectomy (OC) was performed on 26 patients. A comparison of data from these groups showed no significant difference in age or sex. Hospitalization costs averaged $5,390 for the LC group versus $5,392 for the OC group. Postoperative hospital stay averaged 1.3 days for the LC group versus 3.7 days for the OC group (P < 0.0001). The mean time of return to work and regular activities was 8.2 days for the LC group and 42.8 days for the OC group (P < 0.0001). Patient satisfaction was evaluated by an independent, postoperative, nonbiased phone interview at 6 weeks. In the LC group, 96 per cent were very satisfied and 4 per cent were satisfied. In the OC group, 14% were very satisfied, 67% were satisfied, and 19% were not satisfied. This study indicates that laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers significant advantages for patient recovery and satisfaction while providing a safe, cost-effective method for the treatment of gallbladder disease.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 27
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in cirrhotic patients: A prospective randomized study
    El-Awadi, Saleh
    El-Nakeeb, Ayman
    Youssef, Tamer
    Fikry, Amir
    Abd El-Hamed, Tito M.
    Ghazy, Hosam
    Foda, Elyamany
    Farid, Mohamed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 7 (01) : 66 - 69
  • [12] THE MORBIDITY OF SURGICAL ACCESS - A STUDY OF OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    FARROW, HC
    FLETCHER, DR
    JONES, RM
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 63 (12): : 952 - 954
  • [13] Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy
    Fajardo, Roosevelt
    Ignacio Valenzuela, Jose
    Catalina Olaya, Sandra
    Quintero, Gustavo
    Carrasquilla, Gabriel
    Eduardo Pinzon, Carlos
    Lopez, Catalina
    Camilo Ramirez, Juan
    BIOMEDICA, 2011, 31 (04): : 514 - 524
  • [14] Cost and outcomes of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Mongolia
    Lombardo, Sarah
    Rosenberg, Jenna S.
    Kim, Jaewhan
    Erdene, Sarnai
    Sergelen, Orgoi
    Nellermoe, Jonathan
    Finlayson, Samuel R.
    Price, Raymond R.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 229 : 186 - 191
  • [15] Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Prospective, Randomized Study
    Hamad, Mostafa A.
    Thabet, Mostafa
    Badawy, Abdalla
    Mourad, Farouk
    Abdel-Salam, Mahmoud
    Abdel-Rahman, Mohammad El-Taher
    Hafez, Mohammad Zein El-Deen
    Sherif, Tahra
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 20 (05): : 405 - 409
  • [16] A PROSPECTIVE COST-ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    TRAVERSO, LW
    HARGRAVE, K
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (05): : 503 - 506
  • [17] Laparoscopic Versus Open Cholecystectomy: A Cost–Effectiveness Analysis at Rwanda Military Hospital
    Allison Silverstein
    Ainhoa Costas-Chavarri
    Mussa R. Gakwaya
    Joseph Lule
    Swagoto Mukhopadhyay
    John G. Meara
    Mark G. Shrime
    World Journal of Surgery, 2017, 41 : 1225 - 1233
  • [18] COST-ANALYSIS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN COMPARISON WITH OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    DUPONT, TC
    MARTIN, MF
    SANCHEZ, CT
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 1995, 87 (06) : 449 - 452
  • [19] Safety and effectiveness of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital: A prospective study of 110 consecutive patients
    Marinis A.
    Stamatakis E.
    Tsaroucha A.
    Dafnios N.
    Anastasopoulos G.
    Polymeneas G.
    Theodosopoulos T.
    BMC Research Notes, 3 (1)
  • [20] THE COST OF LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL
    VANEK, VW
    BOURGUET, CC
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1995, 9 (03): : 314 - 323