Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery

被引:38
|
作者
Oard, Douglas [1 ]
Baron, Jason [2 ]
Hedin, Bruce [3 ]
Lewis, David [4 ]
Tomlinson, Stephen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Inst Adv Comp Studies, Coll Informat Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Natl Archives & Records Adm, Off Gen Counsel, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] H5, 71 Stevenson St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
[4] David D Lewis Consulting, 1341 W Fullerton Ave,251, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
[5] Open Text Corp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
E-discovery; Information retrieval; Interactive search; Evaluation;
D O I
10.1007/s10506-010-9093-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of information retrieval technology in electronic discovery (E-discovery) has become the subject of judicial rulings and practitioner controversy. The scale and nature of E-discovery tasks, however, has pushed traditional information retrieval evaluation approaches to their limits. This paper reviews the legal and operational context of E-discovery and the approaches to evaluating search technology that have evolved in the research community. It then describes a multi-year effort carried out as part of the Text Retrieval Conference to develop evaluation methods for responsive review tasks in E-discovery. This work has led to new approaches to measuring effectiveness in both batch and interactive frameworks, large data sets, and some surprising results for the recall and precision of Boolean and statistical information retrieval methods. The paper concludes by offering some thoughts about future research in both the legal and technical communities toward the goal of reliable, effective use of information retrieval in E-discovery.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 386
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Design and Implementation of E-Discovery as a Service based on Cloud Computing
    Lee, Taerim
    Kim, Hun
    Rhee, Kyung-Hyune
    Shin, Sang Uk
    COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 10 (02) : 703 - 724
  • [33] Recognizing the Impact of E-Discovery Amendments on Electronic Records Management
    Ward, Burke T.
    Purwin, Carolyn
    Sipior, Janice C.
    Volonino, Linda
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 26 (04) : 350 - 356
  • [34] Assessing the Reliability and Reusability of an E-Discovery Privilege Test Collection
    Vinjumur, Jyothi K.
    Oard, Douglas W.
    Paik, Jiaul H.
    SIGIR'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 37TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2014, : 1047 - 1050
  • [35] E-DISCOVERY REALPOLITIK: WHY RULE 37(E) MUST EMBRACE SANCTIONS
    Motylinski, John E.
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW, 2015, (04): : 1605 - 1644
  • [36] Look before you leap: A guide to the law of inadvertent disclosure of privileged information in the era of e-discovery
    Cohen, Julie
    IOWA LAW REVIEW, 2008, 93 (02) : 627 - 663
  • [37] A Framework for the E-Discovery of Social Media Content in the United States
    Sipior, Janice C.
    Ward, Burke T.
    Volonino, Linda
    MacGabhann, Labhras
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2013, 30 (04) : 352 - 358
  • [38] E-discovery: Identifying and mitigating security risks during litigation
    Pivot Group
    IT Prof, 2008, 4 (20-25):
  • [39] E-Discovery: What Future Business Leaders Need to Know
    Usry, Mark L.
    Law, Mark
    Leinbach, Wilmer
    Magolis, David E.
    Staley, A. Blair
    Shapeero, Mike
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & FINANCE LIBRARIANSHIP, 2010, 15 (02) : 78 - 93
  • [40] Benefits and Risks of Social Business: Are Companies Considering E-Discovery?
    Sipior, Janice C.
    Ward, Burke T.
    Volonino, Linda
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (04) : 328 - 339