Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery

被引:38
|
作者
Oard, Douglas [1 ]
Baron, Jason [2 ]
Hedin, Bruce [3 ]
Lewis, David [4 ]
Tomlinson, Stephen [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Inst Adv Comp Studies, Coll Informat Studies, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Natl Archives & Records Adm, Off Gen Counsel, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[3] H5, 71 Stevenson St, San Francisco, CA 94105 USA
[4] David D Lewis Consulting, 1341 W Fullerton Ave,251, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
[5] Open Text Corp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
E-discovery; Information retrieval; Interactive search; Evaluation;
D O I
10.1007/s10506-010-9093-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of information retrieval technology in electronic discovery (E-discovery) has become the subject of judicial rulings and practitioner controversy. The scale and nature of E-discovery tasks, however, has pushed traditional information retrieval evaluation approaches to their limits. This paper reviews the legal and operational context of E-discovery and the approaches to evaluating search technology that have evolved in the research community. It then describes a multi-year effort carried out as part of the Text Retrieval Conference to develop evaluation methods for responsive review tasks in E-discovery. This work has led to new approaches to measuring effectiveness in both batch and interactive frameworks, large data sets, and some surprising results for the recall and precision of Boolean and statistical information retrieval methods. The paper concludes by offering some thoughts about future research in both the legal and technical communities toward the goal of reliable, effective use of information retrieval in E-discovery.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 386
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN EXTENDED MODEL FOR E-DISCOVERY OPERATIONS
    Billard, David
    ADVANCES IN DIGITAL FORENSICS V, 2009, 306 : 277 - 287
  • [22] Designing an Undergraduate Minor Program in E-Discovery
    Luoma, Milton
    Liu, Jigang
    Qian, Kai
    ITICSE'17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2017, : 361 - 361
  • [23] ATTORNEYS, E-DISCOVERY, AND THE CASE FOR 37(G)
    Mancusi, Marilyn G.
    NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW, 2022, 97 (05) : 2227 - 2261
  • [24] info insider Justifying E-Discovery Systems
    Boeri, Robert
    ECONTENT, 2009, 32 (08) : 18 - 18
  • [25] Auto-Grouping Emails For Faster E-Discovery
    Joshi, Sachindra
    Contractor, Danish
    Ng, Kenney
    Deshpande, Prasad M.
    Hampp, Thomas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE VLDB ENDOWMENT, 2011, 4 (12): : 1284 - 1294
  • [26] Datenschutz konformer Einsatz von E-Discovery Systemen
    Hakan Özbek
    Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD, 2010, 34 (8) : 576 - 580
  • [27] Using Hybrid Search and Query for E-discovery Identification
    Grosvenor, Dave
    Seaborne, Andy
    SEMANTIC WEB - ISWC 2009, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5823 : 811 - 826
  • [28] info insider E-Discovery: Your Next Nightmare?
    Boeri, Robert
    ECONTENT, 2010, 33 (08) : 15 - 15
  • [29] Where E-discovery and copyright laws could collide
    Ojala, M
    ONLINE, 2005, 29 (01): : 22 - 22
  • [30] Only yesterday: Reflections on rulemaking responses to e-discovery
    Marcus, R
    FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2004, 73 (01) : 1 - 21