Comparative Study of Intra-Cervical Foley Catheter and Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Fareed, Perveena [1 ]
Malik, Saba [1 ]
Mahajan, Neha [1 ]
Nazir, Tanzeela [1 ]
Kawoosa, Sanjeeda [1 ]
机构
[1] LD Hosp, Govt Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Srinagar 190001, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
Cervical ripening; Foley catheter; Misoprostol;
D O I
10.17354/ijss/2015/302
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Physical and chemical changes in the uterine cervix and the lower uterine segment, which normally precede the onset of labor are referred to as ripening and seem to be essential to normal labor and delivery. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effi cacy of intracervical Foley catheter and 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol in pre-induction cervical ripening. Study Design: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Srinagar from March 2012 to August 2013. 200 patients at term with a Bishop's score = 3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive intracervical Foley catheter (100 pts) or 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol (100 pts). After 6 h post-induction bishop's score was noted and labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and t-test. Result: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, indication of induction, and initial bishop's score. Both groups showed signifi cant change in the Bishop's score, 3.8 +/- 1.1 and 3.6 +/- 1.1 for Foley catheter and misoprostol, respectively, P < 0.001; however there was no signifi cant difference between the two groups. 14 cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 19 (19%) were performed in Group B (not signifi cant). The induction to the delivery interval was 18.1 +/- 3.6 h in Group A and 17.7 +/- 4.1 h in Group B (P = 0.408). Apgar score, birth weights, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and maternal side effects showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that both Foley catheter and vaginal misoprostol are equally effective in pre-induction cervical ripening.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
    Alfred Osoti
    Davies Kiprop Kibii
    Tito Mario Kual Tong
    Innocent Maranga
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18
  • [32] Other mechanical methods for pre-induction cervical ripening
    Dune, Danielle
    Lawal, Aminatu
    Zegelbone, Phillip
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 444 - 449
  • [33] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reply
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 157 - 157
  • [34] Transcervical foley catheter with vaginal isosorbide mononitrate versus transcervical foley catheter alone for pre-induction cervical ripening for women undergoing planned vaginal birth after previous caesarean section (VBAC): A randomized controlled trial
    Liyanapatabandi, D.
    Karunasinghe, J.
    Ziard, M. H.
    Prathapan, R.
    Sampath, B. S. C.
    Jayasinghe, K. S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 104 - 104
  • [35] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with misoprostol, dinoprostone gel, and a Foley catheter: A randomized trial of 3 techniques
    Barrilleaux, PS
    Bofill, JA
    Terrone, DA
    Magann, EF
    May, WL
    Morrison, JC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 186 (06) : 1124 - 1129
  • [36] Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
    Nazanin Abdi
    Azin Alavi
    Forough Pakbaz
    Hossein Darabi
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [37] Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening
    Chen, Wenhang
    Xue, Jing
    Gaudet, Laura
    Walker, Mark
    Wen, Shi Wu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 129 (03) : 193 - 198
  • [38] Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial
    Abdi, Nazanin
    Alavi, Azin
    Pakbaz, Forough
    Darabi, Hossein
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [39] A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening
    Sciscione, AC
    Nguyen, L
    Manley, J
    Pollock, M
    Maas, B
    Colmorgen, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (04): : 603 - 607
  • [40] Oral misoprostol vs. vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Adam, I
    Hassan, OA
    Elhassan, EM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2005, 89 (02) : 142 - 143