Comparative Study of Intra-Cervical Foley Catheter and Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Fareed, Perveena [1 ]
Malik, Saba [1 ]
Mahajan, Neha [1 ]
Nazir, Tanzeela [1 ]
Kawoosa, Sanjeeda [1 ]
机构
[1] LD Hosp, Govt Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Srinagar 190001, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
Cervical ripening; Foley catheter; Misoprostol;
D O I
10.17354/ijss/2015/302
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Physical and chemical changes in the uterine cervix and the lower uterine segment, which normally precede the onset of labor are referred to as ripening and seem to be essential to normal labor and delivery. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effi cacy of intracervical Foley catheter and 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol in pre-induction cervical ripening. Study Design: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Srinagar from March 2012 to August 2013. 200 patients at term with a Bishop's score = 3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive intracervical Foley catheter (100 pts) or 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol (100 pts). After 6 h post-induction bishop's score was noted and labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and t-test. Result: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, indication of induction, and initial bishop's score. Both groups showed signifi cant change in the Bishop's score, 3.8 +/- 1.1 and 3.6 +/- 1.1 for Foley catheter and misoprostol, respectively, P < 0.001; however there was no signifi cant difference between the two groups. 14 cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 19 (19%) were performed in Group B (not signifi cant). The induction to the delivery interval was 18.1 +/- 3.6 h in Group A and 17.7 +/- 4.1 h in Group B (P = 0.408). Apgar score, birth weights, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and maternal side effects showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that both Foley catheter and vaginal misoprostol are equally effective in pre-induction cervical ripening.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Vaginal Misoprostol versus Cervical Foley Plus Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
    Hill, James B.
    Thigpen, Brad D.
    Bofill, James A.
    Magann, Everett
    Moore, Lisa E.
    Martin, James N., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 26 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [22] Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening
    Ezebialu, Ifeanyichukwu U.
    Eke, Ahizechukwu C.
    Eleje, George U.
    Nwachukwu, Chukwuemeka E.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (06):
  • [23] Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening
    Chen, Vicky
    Sheehan, Penelope
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (15): : 2954 - 2960
  • [24] Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25g and 50g vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients
    Szczesny, Witold
    Sandvik, Leiv
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2009, 22 (03): : 265 - 268
  • [25] Infectious complications of pre-induction cervical ripening with the intracervical foley catheter balloon: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Sanchez-Ramos, Luis
    Heinemann, Jennifer
    Kaunitz, Andrew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S103 - S103
  • [26] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Carbone, Jeanine F.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Fogertey, Patricia J.
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Macones, George A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 121 (02): : 247 - 252
  • [27] Combination of Foley Bulb and Vaginal Misoprostol Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Visser, Liesbeth
    de Graaf, Irene M.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (01): : 156 - 157
  • [28] Vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Gaffaney, Cecilia A. Lyons
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (03): : 627 - 641
  • [29] Cervical ripening with the Foley catheter
    Cromi, A.
    Ghezzi, F.
    Tomera, S.
    Uccella, S.
    Lischetti, B.
    Bolis, P. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2007, 97 (02) : 105 - 109
  • [30] Effect of extra-amniotic Foley's catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
    Osoti, Alfred
    Kibii, Davies Kiprop
    Tong, Tito Mario Kual
    Maranga, Innocent
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2018, 18