Comparative Study of Intra-Cervical Foley Catheter and Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening

被引:0
|
作者
Fareed, Perveena [1 ]
Malik, Saba [1 ]
Mahajan, Neha [1 ]
Nazir, Tanzeela [1 ]
Kawoosa, Sanjeeda [1 ]
机构
[1] LD Hosp, Govt Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Srinagar 190001, Jammu & Kashmir, India
关键词
Cervical ripening; Foley catheter; Misoprostol;
D O I
10.17354/ijss/2015/302
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Physical and chemical changes in the uterine cervix and the lower uterine segment, which normally precede the onset of labor are referred to as ripening and seem to be essential to normal labor and delivery. Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effi cacy of intracervical Foley catheter and 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol in pre-induction cervical ripening. Study Design: A randomized, prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Srinagar from March 2012 to August 2013. 200 patients at term with a Bishop's score = 3 with various indications for induction were randomly allocated to receive intracervical Foley catheter (100 pts) or 50 mcg vaginal misoprostol (100 pts). After 6 h post-induction bishop's score was noted and labor was augmented if required. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test and t-test. Result: The groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, gestational age, indication of induction, and initial bishop's score. Both groups showed signifi cant change in the Bishop's score, 3.8 +/- 1.1 and 3.6 +/- 1.1 for Foley catheter and misoprostol, respectively, P < 0.001; however there was no signifi cant difference between the two groups. 14 cesarean sections (14%) were performed in Group A and 19 (19%) were performed in Group B (not signifi cant). The induction to the delivery interval was 18.1 +/- 3.6 h in Group A and 17.7 +/- 4.1 h in Group B (P = 0.408). Apgar score, birth weights, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and maternal side effects showed no difference between the two groups. Conclusion: This study shows that both Foley catheter and vaginal misoprostol are equally effective in pre-induction cervical ripening.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 43
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Study of Intra-cervical Foley's Catheter and PGE(2) Gel for Pre-induction Ripening (Cervical)
    Deshmukh, V. L.
    Yelikar, K. A.
    Deshmukh, A. B.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2011, 61 (04): : 418 - 421
  • [2] Combined Foley's catheter and misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening
    Adams, Loren William
    Griffin, Christopher
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01): : 118 - 118
  • [3] Intravaginal misoprostol versus transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening
    Adeniji, AO
    Olayemi, O
    Odukogbe, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (02) : 130 - 132
  • [4] Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening:A randomised controlled trial
    Aduloju, Olusola Peter
    Akintayo, Akinyemi Akinsoji
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 57 (01): : 119 - 119
  • [5] Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial
    Aduloju, Olusola P.
    Akintayo, Akinyemi A.
    Adanikin, Abiodun I.
    Ade-Ojo, Idowu P.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 56 (06): : 578 - 584
  • [6] Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
    Roudsari, Fatemeh Vahid
    Ayati, Sedigheh
    Ghasemi, Marzieh
    Mofrad, Maliheh Hasanzadeh
    Shakeri, Mohamad Taghi
    Farshidi, Farnoush
    Shahabian, Masoud
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 10 (01): : 149 - 154
  • [7] Use of the Foley catheter versus a double balloon cervical ripening catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening in postdate primigravidae
    Ahmed, Waleed Ali Sayed
    Ibrahim, Zakia Mahdy
    Ashor, Osama Elsayed
    Mohamed, Mariam Lotfi
    Ahmed, Magdy Refaat
    Elshahat, Amal Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 42 (11) : 1489 - 1494
  • [8] Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial
    de Oliveira e Oliveira, Maria Virginia
    von Oberst, Priscilla
    Correa Leite, Guilherme Karam
    Aguemi, Adalberto
    Kenj, Grecy
    de Toledo Leme, Vera Denise
    Sass, Nelson
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2010, 32 (07): : 346 - 351
  • [9] Oral misoprostol vs intra-cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction
    Kamal, Patil P.
    Swamy, M. K.
    Radhika, Rao K.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (02): : 128 - 131
  • [10] Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction
    Kashanian, M
    Akbarian, AR
    Fekrat, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (01) : 79 - 80