VALIDATION OF THE KESSLER'S PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE (K10 & K6) IN A MALAYSIAN POPULATION

被引:0
|
作者
Tiong, Xun Ting [1 ]
Abdullah, Nur Sara Shahira [1 ]
Bujang, Mohamad Adam [1 ]
Sapri, Fatin Ellisya Binti [1 ]
Ratnasingam, Selvasingam [5 ]
Joon, Chong Kok [6 ]
Wee, Hwee Lin [7 ]
Venkataraman, Kavita [8 ]
Tai, E. Shyong [8 ]
Fong, Alan Yean Yip [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Jalan Hosp, Kuching 93586, Sarawak, Malaysia
[2] Sarawak Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Sarawak 93300, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan 94300, Malaysia
[5] Sarawak Gen Hosp, Dept Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Kuching 93586, Malaysia
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Med, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Pharm, Fac Sci, Singapore 119077, Singapore
来源
ASEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2018年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Kessler's Physiology Distress Scale; K10; K6; Malay Version;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: A quick assessment tool for screening individuals with depression or anxiety is pertinent in mental-health set up. This study aims to validate the K10 and the K6 to screen patients with non-specific psychological distress in a Malaysian population. Methods: Translation of the questionnaire was done from English to Malay. Face validity was conducted on patients, and a pilot study was performed to assess the reliability of the K10 questionnaire. Fieldwork was conducted to determine the reliability and validity of the K10 questionnaire based on convenience sampling of healthy individuals and patients diagnosed with psychiatric illness. Malay version for K10 was administered to healthy participants (group without psychological distress) and patients on psychiatric clinic follow up (psychological distress). Data collection was done between August 2016 and September 2016. Result: A total of 94 subjects were recruited in the study, of which 32 formed the case group. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for K10 were 0.837(control) and 0.885 (case), as for K6 were 0.716 (control) and 0.859 (case). The total score of the K10 and the K6 clearly differentiated between the control and case groups (p<0.001). The area under the curve for K10 and K6 were 0.84 with 95% CI (0.81, 0.96) and 0.86 with 95% CI (0.77, 0.94) respectively. For K10, at the optimal cut-off score of 17, the sensitivity and specificity were 84.4% and 75.3% respectively while for K6, at the optimal cut-off score of 11, the sensitivity and specificity were 78.1% and 75.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The Malay version of the K10 and the K6 are reliable and valid to be used for screening patients with non-specific psychological distress in a Malaysian population. Kessler psychological distress scale has minimal items and yet this Kessler psychological distress scales have minimal items and yet are an effective screening tool.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 85
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adaptation of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) for Argentinean population
    Elena Brenlla, Maria
    Aranguren, Maria
    REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA PUCP, 2010, 28 (02): : 308 - 340
  • [2] Interpreting scores on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
    Andrews, G
    Slade, T
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (06) : 494 - 497
  • [3] Validation of the K6/K10 Scales of Psychological Distress and Their Optimal Cutoff Scores for Older Koreans
    Min, Jong Won
    Lee, Sun Hae
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGING & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 80 (03): : 264 - 282
  • [4] Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress Scale (K10)
    Baillie, AJ
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 40 (09) : 743 - 748
  • [5] Predictive gender and education bias in Kessler's psychological distress Scale (k10)
    Andrew J. Baillie
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2005, 40 : 743 - 748
  • [6] The Distress Questionnaire-5: Population screener for psychological distress was more accurate than the K6/K10
    Batterham, Philip J.
    Sunderland, Matthew
    Carragher, Natacha
    Calear, Alison L.
    Mackinnon, Andrew J.
    Slade, Tim
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 71 : 35 - 42
  • [7] The Psychometric Properties of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in a General Population Sample of Adolescents
    Mewton, Louise
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Slade, Tim
    Hobbs, Megan J.
    Brownhill, Louise
    Birrell, Louise
    Tonks, Zoe
    Teesson, Maree
    Newton, Nicola
    Chapman, Cath
    Allsop, Steve
    Hides, Leanne
    McBride, Nyanda
    Andrews, Gavin
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2016, 28 (10) : 1232 - 1242
  • [8] THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE KESSLER PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE (K6) IN A GENERAL POPULATION SAMPLE OF ADOLESCENTS
    Mewton, Louise
    Kessler, Ronald C.
    Slade, Tim
    Hobbs, Megan J.
    Brownhill, Louise
    Birrell, Louise
    Tonks, Zoe
    Teesson, Maree
    Newton, Nicola
    Chapman, Cath
    Allsop, Steve
    Hides, Leanne
    McBride, Nyanda
    Andrews, Gavin
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2016, 35 : 7 - 7
  • [9] Adaptation and validation of short scales for assessment o psychological distress in Iran: The Persian K10 and K6
    Hajebi, Ahmad
    Motevalian, Abbas
    Amin-Esmaeili, Masoumeh
    Rahimi-Movaghar, Afarin
    Sharifi, Vandad
    Hoseini, Leila
    Shadloo, Behrang
    Mojtabai, Ramin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (03)
  • [10] Testing the Impact of Variations in Administration on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
    Chilver, Miranda R.
    Burns, Richard A.
    Botha, Ferdi
    Butterworth, Peter
    ASSESSMENT, 2024,