Effect of Different Breast Densities and Average Glandular Dose on Contrast to Noise Ratios in Full-Field Digital Mammography: Simulation and Phantom Study

被引:4
|
作者
Nakamura, Noriko [1 ,2 ]
Okafuji, Yuka [1 ]
Adachi, Saori [1 ]
Takahashi, Kana [3 ]
Nakakuma, Takashi [3 ]
Ueno, Sohichirou [3 ]
机构
[1] Ageo Cent Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ageo City, Saitama 3628588, Japan
[2] Suzuka Univ Med Sci, Grad Sch Hlth Sci, Suzuka, Mie 5100293, Japan
[3] Ageo Cent Gen Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Ageo City, Saitama 3628588, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2018/6192594
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We aimed to investigate the effects of mammary gland density and average glandular dose (AGD) on contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of breast-equivalent phantoms with different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios. Full-field digital-mammography breast X-rays were performed on breast-equivalent phantoms with three different mammary gland/fat tissue ratios (Phantom A [30/70], Phantom B [50/50], and Phantom C [70/30]) and seven thicknesses ranging from 10 mm to 70 mm. The prediction formula for the CNR was calculated by multivariate analysis and the effects of the various parameters on CNR were evaluated using a multiple regression analysis model. Higher CNR values were obtained with lower mammary gland/fat tissue ratios and lower phantom thicknesses. Variation in CNR among the three breast models was low (coefficient of variation, 3.4-8.7%) at lower phantom thicknesses (10-30 mm) and high (coefficient of variation, 10.5-16.8%) at higher phantom thickness (50-70 mm). CNR showed a strong negative correlation (r = -0.8989) with AGD across all three mammary gland ratios. A predictive formula for CNR using AGD and mammary gland density was developed. CNR can be predicted with high precision using AGD and mammary gland density. The predicted CNR could be used to measure the diagnostic reliability of mammography in breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of different exposure parameters on radiation dose in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study
    Asbeutah, A. M.
    Brindhaban, A.
    AlMajran, A. A.
    Asbeutah, S. A.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2020, 26 (03) : E129 - E133
  • [32] Comparison of a new full-field digital mammography system and conventional film-screen mammography: A phantom study
    Bick, U
    Diekmann, F
    Marth, F
    Le Roux, A
    Juran, R
    Friedrich, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 152 - 152
  • [33] Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system
    Palma, B. A.
    Rosado-Mendez, I.
    Villasenor, Y.
    Brandan, M. E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (02) : 577 - 589
  • [34] Modification of the CDMAM contrast-detail phantom for image quality evaluation of full-field digital mammography systems
    Bijkerk, KR
    Thijssen, MAO
    Arnoldussen, TJM
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 633 - 640
  • [35] Eye radiation dose from breast cancer screening using full field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: A phantom study
    Ali, R. M. K. M.
    Hogg, P.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHY, 2024, 30 (01) : 141 - 144
  • [36] Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: A simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom
    Liu, Xinming
    Lai, Chao-Jen
    Whitman, Gary J.
    Geiser, William R.
    Shen, Youtao
    Yi, Ying
    Shaw, Chris C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (12) : 6489 - 6501
  • [37] AN OBSERVER PERFORMANCE STUDY COMPARING THE INTERPRETATION OF FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY WITH DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS
    Wasan, Rema K.
    Iqbal, Asif
    Evans, David R.
    Peacock, Clare
    Morel, Juliet C.
    Douiri, Abdel
    Michell, Michael J.
    [J]. EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 8 (06): : 32 - 32
  • [38] COMPARISON OF DOSE RECEIVED DURING BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS PERFORMED BY USING TWO DIFFERENT IMAGING MODALITIES: CONTRAST-ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND FULL-FIELD DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
    Kisielewicz, K.
    Rawojc, K.
    Tulik, M.
    Dziubinska, A.
    Mazur, L.
    Kieltyka, B.
    Lukaszewska, J.
    Najberg-Pierzchala, D.
    Gadek, M.
    Luczynska, E.
    Wos, Z.
    Miszczyk, J.
    Heinze, S.
    Dziecichowicz, A.
    [J]. ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2020, 51 (01): : 339 - 344
  • [39] A Multisite Study of a Breast Density Deep Learning Model for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Synthetic Mammography
    Matthews, Thomas P.
    Singh, Sadanand
    Mombourquette, Brent
    Su, Jason
    Shah, Meet P.
    Pedemonte, Stefano
    Long, Aaron
    Maffit, David
    Gurney, Jenny
    Hoil, Rodrigo Morales
    Ghare, Nikita
    Smith, Douglas
    Moore, Stephen M.
    Marks, Susan C.
    Wahl, Richard L.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [40] Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis
    Fusco, Roberta
    Raiano, Nicola
    Raiano, Concetta
    Maio, Francesca
    Vallone, Paolo
    Raso, Mauro Mattace
    Setola, Sergio Venanzio
    Granata, Vincenza
    Rubulotta, Maria Rosaria
    Barretta, Maria Lusia
    Petrosino, Teresa
    Petrillo, Antonella
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 126