NORMAL GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR MULTINOMIAL MODELS WITH LARGE DEGREES OF FREEDOM

被引:76
|
作者
OSIUS, G [1 ]
ROJEK, D [1 ]
机构
[1] MKT SYST,W-4300 ESSEN 18,GERMANY
关键词
BINOMIAL DATA; LIKELIHOOD RATIO; PEARSON CHI SQUARE; POWER-DIVERGENCE STATISTIC; SPARSE DATA;
D O I
10.2307/2290653
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Goodness-of-fit tests for independent multinomials with parameters to be estimated are usually based on Pearson's X2 or the likelihood ratio G2. Both are included in the family of power-divergence statistics SD(lambda). For increasing sample sizes each SD(lambda) has an asymptotic X2 distribution, provided that the number of cells remains fixed. We are dealing with an increasing-cells approach, where the number J of independent multinomials increases while the number of classes for each multinomial and the number of parameters remain fixed. Extending results on X2 and G2, the asymptotic normality of any SD(lambda) is obtained for increasing cells. The corresponding normal goodness-of-fit tests discussed here apply for models with large degrees of freedom with no restrictions imposed on the sizes N(j) of each multinomial, allowing large as well as small expectations (sparse data) within each cell. The asymptotic expectation and variance of SD(lambda) are easy to compute for Pearson's X2 and simplify considerably for general lambda if the harmonic or arithmetic mean of the multinomial sizes N(j) are large. Applications to quantal response models for binomial data are treated in more detail. It turns out that the asymptotic expectation and variance of X2 and G2 agree to first order with the conditional moments given the estimated parameters. And for binary data (with N(j) = 1 for all j), the goodness-of-fit tests appear as score tests with respect to an enlarged model. Our presentation focuses on general aspects of the tests and its applications rather than on formal proofs for the underlying limit results, which are only outlined here.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1152
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Alternative Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Linear Models
    Christensen, Ronald
    Sun, Siu Kei
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 105 (489) : 291 - 301
  • [22] PARAMETER-ESTIMATION AND GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTING IN MULTINOMIAL MODELS
    GARCIAPEREZ, MA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 47 : 247 - 282
  • [23] Goodness-of-fit tests in conditional duration models
    Meintanis, Simos G.
    Milosevic, Bojana
    Obradovic, Marko
    STATISTICAL PAPERS, 2020, 61 (01) : 123 - 140
  • [24] Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models
    Colling, Benjamin
    Van Keilegom, Ingrid
    TEST, 2016, 25 (02) : 291 - 308
  • [25] Comments on: Goodness-of-fit tests in mixed models
    Jiming Jiang
    Thuan Nguyen
    TEST, 2009, 18 : 248 - 255
  • [26] Goodness-of-fit tests for arbitrary multivariate models
    Shtembari, Lolian
    Caldwell, Allen
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (12)
  • [27] Goodness-of-fit tests in semiparametric transformation models
    Benjamin Colling
    Ingrid Van Keilegom
    TEST, 2016, 25 : 291 - 308
  • [28] Goodness-of-fit tests in conditional duration models
    Simos G. Meintanis
    Bojana Milošević
    Marko Obradović
    Statistical Papers, 2020, 61 : 123 - 140
  • [29] NN goodness-of-fit tests for linear models
    Stute, W
    Manteiga, WG
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 1996, 53 (01) : 75 - 92
  • [30] GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS FOR MODELS OF LATENCY AND CHOICE
    MILLER, J
    GREENO, JG
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 17 (01) : 1 - 13