The added value of facilities management: benchmarking work processes

被引:34
|
作者
Wauters, Bram [1 ]
机构
[1] Bernard Williams Associates, BWA Facil Consultancy, London, England
关键词
Benchmarking; Business support services; Service industries;
D O I
10.1108/02632770510578511
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - To provide a review of the various approaches to benchmarking and best practice facilities benchmarking techniques currently applied on the European Facilities Management Market. Design/methodology/approach - Using practical examples, the benchmarking methodologies for assessing the three main aspects of facilities service provision - i.e. process, quality and costs - are identified and discussed in the context of their relationship one to the other. The central mechanics and approaches to benchmarking are identified prior to a more detailed assessment of the various methodologies. Findings - The benchmarking techniques discussed are all applicable to derive benchmarks for comparison with industry standards. It recognises the pros and cons of each methodology and highlights the circumstances at which to best implement them. Practical implications - Facilities management is at different degrees of development in the EU member states and as such the benchmarking methodologies discussed in this paper might not be appropriate for immediate implementation in each of the member countries. Originality/value - This paper evaluates a current main topic within the facilities management industry and provides a step-to-step guide to organisations that want to commence benchmarking their facilities services provision.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Value Added of Management to Health Care Organizations
    Issel, Michele L.
    [J]. HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 45 (02) : 95 - 95
  • [42] Interaction of Earnings Management and Economic Value Added
    Jurickova, Veronika
    Gregova, Elena
    [J]. EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT: A 2025 VISION TO SUSTAIN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DURING GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2020, : 18347 - 18353
  • [43] THE SELECTION OF BENCHMARKING PARTNERS FOR VALUE MANAGEMENT: AN ANALYTIC APPROACH
    Shen, Qiping
    Liu, Guiwen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2007, 7 (02) : 11 - 22
  • [44] The polyvalent scientist: The added value of management training
    Theodosiou, Maria
    Amir-Aslani, Arsia
    [J]. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 2013, 19 (03) : 6 - 9
  • [45] Software configuration management: Added value assessment
    Smrekar, G
    [J]. SOFTWARE QUALITY ENGINEERING, 1997, : 179 - 187
  • [46] Management of aortic stenosis: added value for biomarkers?
    Bergler-Klein, J.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 126 : 3 - 3
  • [47] THE ADDED VALUE OF WOMEN IN MANAGEMENT: THE CZECH CASE
    Kreckova, Zuzana
    Zadrazilova, Dana
    Rezankova, Hana
    [J]. PRAGUE ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2016, 25 (03): : 354 - 373
  • [48] The added value of facility management in the educational environment
    Kok, Herman B.
    Mobach, Mark P.
    Omta, Onno S. W. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2011, 9 (04) : 249 - +
  • [49] Business models in facilities management value chains
    Jensen, Per Anker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE REAL ESTATE, 2019, 21 (04) : 307 - 323
  • [50] The Facilities Management Value Map: a conceptual framework
    Jensen, Per
    [J]. FACILITIES, 2010, 28 (3-4) : 175 - 188