WEED SCIENCE Critical Timing of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Removal in Second-Generation Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton

被引:0
|
作者
Fast, B. J. [1 ]
Murdock, S. W. [2 ]
Farris, R. L. [3 ]
Willis, J. B. [4 ]
Murray, D. S. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Agron, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Monsanto Co, St Louis, MO 63167 USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Eastern Oklahoma Agr Expt Stn, Haskell, OK 74436 USA
[4] Monsanto Co, Monmouth, IL 61462 USA
[5] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, 368 Agr Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE | 2009年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Field experiments were conducted in 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006 to determine the critical timing of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) removal in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Treatments consisted of nine durations of Palmer amaranth interference that ranged from 0 to 63 d after emergence (DAE) in increments of 7 d. Glyphosate was applied to remove Palmer amaranth at the appropriate timing for each treatment, and plots were maintained weed-free for the remainder of the season. Cotton lint yield loss increased gradually (from 0 to 3%) when Palmer amaranth removal was delayed from 0 to 21 DAE and increased rapidly (from 3 to 77%) when removal was delayed from 21 DAE to 63 DAE. Palmer amaranth biomass increased slightly when timing of removal was delayed from 0 to 21 DAE and increased dramatically when removal was delayed beyond 21 DAE. Palmer amaranth biomass weights were 0, 96, and 1810 g m(-2) when removal occurred 0, 21, and 63 DAE, respectively; furthermore, regression of cotton lint yield loss as a function of Palmer amaranth biomass revealed that the two variables were strongly correlated. Using a cotton lint yield loss threshold of 2.7%, which was calculated using cotton lint yield, cotton lint price, and cost of glyphosate, the critical timing of Palmer amaranth removal in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton was 19 DAE.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 36
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effective two-pass herbicide programs to control glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean
    Kumar, Vipan
    Liu, Rui
    Peterson, Dallas E.
    Stahlman, Phillip W.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 128 - 135
  • [32] Effect of single or sequential POST herbicide applications on seed production and viability of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in dicamba- and glyphosate-resistant soybean
    de Sanctis, Jose H. S.
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    Kumar, Vipan
    Jhala, Amit J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 449 - 456
  • [33] Evaluation of 2,4-D-based Herbicide Mixtures for Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Lawrence, Benjamin H.
    Bond, Jason A.
    Eubank, Thomas W.
    Golden, Bobby R.
    Cook, Donald R.
    Mangialardi, Joseph P.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (02) : 263 - 271
  • [34] Survey of Glyphosate- and Imazapic-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Florida
    Berger, Sarah T.
    Ferrell, Jason A.
    Dittmar, Peter J.
    Leon, Ramon
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 1 (01):
  • [35] Reduced-input, postemergence weed control with glyphosate and residual herbicides in second-generation glyphosate-resistant cotton
    Scroggs, Derek M.
    Miller, Donnie K.
    Griffin, James L.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    Blouin, David C.
    Stewart, Alexander M.
    Vidrine, P. Roy
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (04) : 997 - 1001
  • [36] High-residue cover crops alone or with strategic tillage to manage glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in southeastern cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)
    Price, A. J.
    Monks, C. D.
    Culpepper, A. S.
    Duzy, L. M.
    Kelton, J. A.
    Marshall, M. W.
    Steckel, L. E.
    Sosnoskie, L. M.
    Nichols, R. L.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2016, 71 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [37] In-field assessment of EPSPS amplification on fitness cost in mixed glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-sensitive populations of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Cahoon, Charles W.
    Jordan, David L.
    Tranel, Patrick J.
    York, Alan C.
    Riggins, Chance
    Seagroves, Richard
    Inman, Matthew
    Everman, Wesley
    Leon, Ramon
    WEED SCIENCE, 2022, 70 (06) : 663 - 668
  • [38] Influence of cover crop residue and residual herbicide on emergence dynamics of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in grain sorghum
    Dhanda, Sachin
    Kumar, Vipan
    Dille, J. Anita
    Obour, Augustine
    Yeager, Elizabeth A.
    Holman, Johnathan
    WEED SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (04) : 387 - 395
  • [39] Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska: Confirmation, EPSPS Gene Amplification, and Response to POST Corn and Soybean Herbicides
    Chahal, Parminder S.
    Varanasi, Vijay K.
    Jugulam, Mithila
    Jhala, Amit J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 80 - 93
  • [40] Herbicide Program Approaches for Managing Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus rudis) in Future Soybean-Trait Technologies
    Meyer, Christopher J.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Young, Bryan G.
    Steckel, Lawrence E.
    Bradley, Kevin W.
    Johnson, William G.
    Loux, Mark M.
    Davis, Vince M.
    Kruger, Greg R.
    Bararpour, Mohammad T.
    Ikley, Joseph T.
    Spaunhorst, Douglas J.
    Butts, Thomas R.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) : 716 - 729