Improving the assessment and monitoring of forest biodiversity

被引:0
|
作者
Spanos, K. A. [1 ]
Feest, A. [2 ,3 ]
Petrakis, P. V. [4 ]
机构
[1] NAGREF, Forest Res Inst, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Water & Environm Management Res Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Ecosulis, Bath, Avon, England
[4] NAGREF, Inst Mediterranean Forest Ecosyst & Forests Prod, Athens, Greece
关键词
Forests; Biological analysis and testing; Ecology;
D O I
10.1108/14777830910922442
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to present a general analysis and overview of forest biodiversity, emphasising the three main components (structure, composition, function) related to biodiversity. Following this theoretical consideration of forest biodiversity the current proposal of the European Environment Agency for biodiversity indicators is presented as a table with the application to forests identified and the direct/indirect nature of the indicator also indicated. Design/methodology/approach - The biodiversity of forests is determined by a number of overall large-scale factors that intimately affect the individual components of biodiversity. A more specific and direct measurement of forest biodiversity is presented with data assessed by the Fungib programme to provide a set of biodiversity indices that can be used to: create biodiversity baselines; compare sites; and follow biodiversity changes through time, all with the possibility of determining significance of change statistically. An example of data derived from a macrofungal survey is presented as an example of how this methodology can be adapted to many groups of organisms. Finally, a further example of using biodiversity quality data to understand changes in biodiversity is presented comparing butterfly biodiversity quality with nitrogen deposition. Findings - This paper shows how an example of function (nitrogen deposition) has affected an element of composition (butterfly biodiversity). This has been made possible by the use of a rational sampling methodology (TRIM) used over a number of years. This metadata analysis of butterfly survey data shows clearly that changes in the butterfly biodiversity quality would have been missed if the normal approach of equating biodiversity with species richness had been adopted. In this example nitrogen-sensitive species loss was compensated by nitrophilic species gain. Originality/value - Such a methodology, therefore, has much to recommend it and it has been shown to be applicable to a wide range of organisms from bryophytes to beetles. For forest biodiversity monitoring the adoption of this kind of rationale will hopefully yield far greater information to the scientific community and policy makers for little extra effort.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] MONITORING BIODIVERSITY - ANALYSIS AMAZONIAN RAIN-FOREST SOUNDS
    RIEDE, K
    [J]. AMBIO, 1993, 22 (08) : 546 - 548
  • [42] Assessment and monitoring of long-term forest cover changes (1920–2013) in Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot
    C SUDHAKAR REDDY
    C S JHA
    V K DADHWAL
    [J]. Journal of Earth System Science, 2016, 125 : 103 - 114
  • [43] European Forest Types and Forest Europe SFM indicators: Tools for monitoring progress on forest biodiversity conservation
    Barbati, A.
    Marchetti, M.
    Chirici, G.
    Corona, P.
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 321 : 145 - 157
  • [44] Scientific Requirements for Monitoring Biodiversity - E.g. Management and Climate Effects on Biodiversity in Forest
    Hickler, Thomas
    [J]. WEGE ZU EINEM ZIEL - UND BEDARFSORIENTIERTEN MONITORING DER BIOLOGISCHEN VIELFALT IM AGRAR- UND FORSTBEREICH - WORKSHOPBERICHT, 2012, 365 : 49 - 58
  • [45] Biodiversity monitoring, ecological integrity, and the design of the New Zealand Biodiversity Assessment Framework
    McGlone, Matt S.
    McNutt, Kate
    Richardson, Sarah J.
    Bellingham, Peter J.
    Wright, Elaine F.
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2020, 44 (02):
  • [46] Public monitoring in the assessment of bird biodiversity in Veliky Novgorod
    Konovalova, M. A.
    Denisenkova, T., V
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY IN THE AGRO-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX AND SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 613
  • [47] Toward the assessment of forest Biodiversity at the scale of forest management units - a European landscape perspective
    Angelstam, P
    Breuss, M
    Mikusinski, G
    [J]. CRITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT AT THE FOREST MANAGEMENT UNIT LEVEL, 2001, (38): : 59 - 74
  • [48] A global assessment of forest integrity within Key Biodiversity Areas
    Crowe, Olivia
    Beresford, Alison E.
    Buchanan, Graeme M.
    Grantham, Hedley S.
    Simkins, Ashley T.
    Watson, James E. M.
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2023, 286
  • [49] A preliminary assessment of congruence between biodiversity patterns in Afrotropical forest birds and forest mammals
    Burgess, N
    de Klerk, H
    Fjeldså, J
    Crowe, T
    Rahbek, R
    [J]. OSTRICH, 2000, 71 (1-2) : 286 - 290
  • [50] Sustainability Assessment of Intensified Forestry-Forest Bioenergy versus Forest Biodiversity Targeting Forest Birds
    Mortberg, Ulla
    Pang, Xi-Lillian
    Treinys, Rimgaudas
    Trubins, Renats
    Mozgeris, Gintautas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 20