DISTILLED WATER CHALLENGES IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN - COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PROTOCOLS

被引:6
|
作者
EICHLER, I
GOTZ, M
ZARKOVIC, J
KOFINGER, A
机构
[1] Department of Pediatrics, Vienna University Hospital, Vienna
关键词
D O I
10.1378/chest.102.3.753
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW) appears a promising candidate for routine challenge testing in bronchial asthma. We have compared two different methods of application of UNDW in 12 asthmatic children with a positive response to methacholine provocation (MCh), in an attempt to increase UNDW sensitivity and to establish standard testing protocols. In addition, results from UNDW challenges were compared to responses to inhalation of jet-nebulized distilled water (JNDW) and cold air (CACh). Compared to MCh, the sensitivity of continuously or intermittently (iUNDW) inhaled UNDW was 67 percent or 75 percent, respectively, when a positive response was defined by a greater-than-or-equal-to 20 percent fall in FEV1, but was higher when definition of a positive response was based on results from flow volume curves. Sensitivity of continuous or intermittent inhalation of JNDW was lower than for UNDW. The UNDW inhalations were better tolerated than CACh. Following stepwise iUNDW challenge, there was a clear reaction plateau for all variables measured. Results indicate that testing protocols with iUNDW inhalations over 6 to 10 min (corresponding to 7 to 11 ml water inhalation) yield the maximum sensitivity attainable with UNDW challenges, and require a minimum of patient and investigator effort.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 758
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SHOULD ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN LAUGH
    LELONG, M
    DUPREY, J
    MUNCH, ML
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 1992, 32 (03): : 140 - 140
  • [22] A COMPARISON OF THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF THEOPHYLLINE IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN IN THE ACUTE EPISODE AND IN REMISSION
    ARNOLD, JD
    HILL, GN
    SANSOM, LN
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 20 (06) : 443 - 447
  • [23] COMPARISON OF ZADITEN-INTAL AND COMBINED PROPHYLAXIS IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    OSVATH, P
    ENDRE, L
    ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 1983, 11 (01) : 24 - 27
  • [24] COMPARISON OF 3 LONG-ACTING THEOPHYLLINES IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    SABLAYROLLES, B
    RODRIGUEZ, F
    DUTAU, G
    ROUFFIAC, R
    ROCHICCIOLI, P
    REVUE FRANCAISE D ALLERGOLOGIE ET D IMMUNOLOGIE CLINIQUE, 1984, 24 (04): : 193 - 195
  • [25] COMPARISON OF THE BRONCHODILATING EFFECT OF OXITROPIUM BROMIDE AND FENOTEROL IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    VANBEVER, HP
    DESAGER, KN
    PAUWELS, JH
    VERMEIRE, PA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1994, 153 (08) : 604 - 606
  • [26] COMPARISON OF RESPONSIVENESS TO METHACHOLINE, HISTAMINE, AND EXERCISE IN SUBGROUPS OF ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    BHAGAT, RG
    GRUNSTEIN, MM
    AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1984, 129 (02): : 221 - 224
  • [27] NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL DYSFUNCTION IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    ANNETT, RD
    BENDER, BG
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1994, 4 (02) : 91 - 115
  • [28] PATIENT EDUCATION IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    KRAEMER, R
    SPECK, S
    SCHONI, MH
    LUNG, 1990, 168 : 469 - 473
  • [29] THE GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    NAVARRO, JM
    PERABA, JG
    FELIPE, PG
    TORRES, PM
    ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 1981, 9 (04) : 289 - 294
  • [30] NEBUHALER IN YOUNG ASTHMATIC-CHILDREN
    BENOIST, MR
    RUFIN, P
    DEBLIC, J
    SCHEINMANN, P
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 1988, 63 (08) : 997 - 997