TENNESSEE CASE - NOTES ON SUPREME COURTS DECISION TO OPEN APPORTIONMENT TO JUDICIAL REVIEW

被引：0

|

作者：

MARGOLIS, H

机构：

来源：

SCIENCE | 1962年 / 136卷 / 3510期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1126/science.136.3510.30

中图分类号：

O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];

学科分类号：

07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：30 / &

相关论文

共 40 条

[31] JUDICIAL-REVIEW, NATIONALISM, AND THE COMMERCE CLAUSE - CONTRASTING ANTEBELLUM AND POSTBELLUM SUPREME-COURT DECISION-MAKING
CLINTON, RL
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 1994, 47 (04) : 857 - 876
[32] Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities: the Danish Supreme Court's Decision in the Ajos Case and the National Limits of Judicial Cooperation
Madsen, Mikael Rask
Olsen, Henrik Palmer
Sadl, Urska
EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (1-2) : 140 - 150
[33] Should German Courts Review Competition Law Awards on the Merits? Significance of the German Federal Supreme Court's Decision of 27 September 2022
Stamer, Hanna L.
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION, 2023, 40 (06): : 765 - 787
[34] NARROW GROUNDS FOR A COMPLEX DECISION - THE SUPREME COURTS REVIEW OF AN AGENCY STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION IN JAPAN-WHALING-ASSOCIATION V AMERICAN-CETACEAN-SOCIETY
GIBSON, CS
ECOLOGY LAW QUARTERLY, 1987, 14 (03) : 485 - 516
[35] Book Review of Persuading the Supreme Court: The significance of briefs in judicial decision-making : By Morgan L.W. Hazelton and Rachael K. Hinkle
Kayla S. Canelo
Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2023, 12 : 325 - 328
[36] “Azamat Valerianovich Ibatullin”Decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (Judicial Collegium for Economic Disputes) 15 December 2020 – Case No. SIP-635/2018
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 (9) : 1282 - 1285
[37] ANTI-ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: CASE REVIEW OF THE MALAYSIAN FEDERAL COURT DECISION IN JAYA SUDHIR A/L JAYARAM V. NAUTICAL SUPREME SDN BHD & ORS
Balasingam, Usharani
CONTEMPORARY ASIA ARBITRATION JOURNAL, 2021, 14 (02): : 275 - 286
[38] Moving Away from Open Judicial Balancing Review The European Court of Human Rights' Approach as Illustrated by Its Case Law Relevant to the Covid-19 Pandemic
Gerards, Janneke
LAW & PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS, 2023, 22 (02): : 365 - 383
[39] Constitutional Courts as Guardians of EU Fundamental Rights? Centralised Judicial Review of Legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber), Judgment of 11 September 2014, Case C-112/13, A v B and others
Paris, Davide
EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW, 2015, 11 (02) : 389 - 407
[40] Comment on “Haitang Bay”: Has the Law Provided for Full Protection Against Trademark Registrations in Bad Faith? An Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court of China in Li Longfeng v. the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board and Sanya City Haitang Bay Management Committee: Decision of the Supreme People’s Court 12 August 2013 – Case No. (2013) Zhi Xing Zi No. 42
Yang Y.
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2015, 46 (4) : 491 - 500

← 1 2 3 4 →