The risk of burnout in the field of long-term care. Strains and health resources of nurses and caregivers

被引:0
|
作者
Brause, Michaela [1 ]
Kleina, Thomas [2 ]
Horn, Annett [2 ]
Schaeffer, Doris [2 ]
机构
[1] Fachhsch Bielefeld, Fachbereich Wirtschaft & Gesundheit Lehreinheit P, Stadtholz 24, D-33609 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ Bielefeld, Fak Gesundheitswissensch, AG Versorgungsforsch & Pflegewissensch 6, Bielefeld, Germany
来源
PRAVENTION UND GESUNDHEITSFORDERUNG | 2015年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Workload; Resources; Long-term care; inpatient; Work-family conflict; Burnout;
D O I
10.1007/s11553-014-0469-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Recent health insurance data indicate that the phenomenon "burnout" is becoming of increasing importance in the working environment. With regard to burnout, staff of long-term care facilities is a particularly vulnerable group. Objectives. It was supposed that strains (e.g., workload) and health resources (e.g., leadership capital) are associated with the risk of burnout. In addition, the objective was to investigate if these factors influence each other and, thus, have an indirect impact on the risk of burnout. Material and methods. A standardized survey in eight long-term care facilities was carried out. Staff members were questioned concerning their individual burnout risk and work-related factors which may influence this risk. Correlation analyses and structural equation modelling were used to test hypotheses. Results. Of staff members, 37 % have an increased risk of burnout. Workload (r = 0.53) and work-family conflict (r = 0.58) are strongly associated with the risk of burnout, while leadership capital (r = -0.34) and social network capital (r = -0.27) show lower correlation coefficients. However, leadership capital is strongly associated with workload (r = -0.51) and our model suggests that it might have an indirect impact on the risk of burnout (total effect = -0.56). Conclusions. The findings indicate that work place health promotion should not only target health-related behavior. Working conditions and management factors seem to have a noticeable influence on the staff's risk of burnout and should therefore be considered when developing workplace health promotion strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 48
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluation of diabetes management in long-term care.
    McNabney, MK
    Tayback, M
    Polyak, K
    Lawhorne, L
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (04) : S102 - S102
  • [12] An unusual case of anxiety in long-term care.
    Lavery, B
    Gillespie, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2006, 54 (04) : S117 - S117
  • [13] Dying with advanced dementia in long-term care.
    Lamberg, JL
    Person, CJ
    Mitchell, SJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (04) : S99 - S100
  • [14] REGISTERED NURSES AND LONG-TERM CARE
    SALMON, P
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 128 (04): : 353 - 354
  • [15] Burnout Among Long-Term Care Staff
    Rai, Gauri S.
    ADMINISTRATION IN SOCIAL WORK, 2010, 34 (03): : 225 - 240
  • [16] Health status of caregivers in long term care
    Monahan, D
    Greene, V
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2005, 45 : 178 - 178
  • [17] Work values and their association with burnout/work engagement among nurses in long-term care hospitals
    Saito, Yumiko
    Igarashi, Ayumi
    Noguchi-Watanabe, Maiko
    Takai, Yukari
    Yamamoto-Mitani, Noriko
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 (04) : 393 - 402
  • [18] Caregivers' attitudes regarding oral health in a long-term care institution in Brazil
    Junges, Roger
    Portella, Fernando Freitas
    Hugo, Fernando Neves
    Pereira Padilha, Dalva Maria
    Werner Samuel, Susana Maria
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2014, 31 (03) : 178 - 183
  • [19] Factors Affecting Age of Entry into Long-Term Care.
    Bellantoni, M. R.
    Schnittker, J.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 : S220 - S220
  • [20] Evaluation of diagnosis and management of dementia in long-term care.
    Barton, CF
    Covinsky, KE
    Johnson, MA
    Yaffe, K
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2001, 49 (04) : S113 - S113