Clinical validation of high risk HPV DNA testing versus ThinPrep cytology for primary cervical cancer screening

被引:1
|
作者
Aboul-Fotouh, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Hana, Ihab [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Menia Univ, Fac Med, OB GYN Dept, Al Minya, Egypt
[2] Taiba Hosp, OB GYN Dept, Kuwait, Kuwait
[3] Menia Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Al Minya, Egypt
[4] Taiba Hosp, Dept Pathol, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
HPV; HPV DNA testing; Pap smear; ThinPrep cytology; Cervial cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.mefs.2012.12.001
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective(s): To compare the validity of the high risk HPV DNA testing using the hybrid capture II technique (HC-II) to ThinPrep cytology for primary cervical cancer screening. Design: Cross sectional pilot study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taiba Hospital, Sabah Al Salem, Kuwait. Methods: Consecutive 1923 cervical smear samples were taken for ThinPrep cytological screening and hr-HPV DNA testing using HC-II assay. Histological diagnoses were obtained from a total of 426 women who had positive results on screening and a group of women with negative screening and suspicious cervix underwent colposcopy and directed biopsies, and those with cervical precancerous lesions or cancer received appropriate treatment. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of screening methods. Results: HPV was found positive in 15.5% of cases. 19/22 cases (86.4.1 A) with a biopsy diagnosis of CIN2 + had a HC-II positive test. For CIN3, HC-II was positive in all cases (100%). Assuming a similar specificity level, the relative sensitivity of the HC-II test was higher when histologically confirmed high grade lesions (CIN2 + or CIN3 +) were observed. HC-II test had the best sensitivity when defining cases as CIN2 + or CIN3 + (98.7% and 100%, respectively). When using the ASCUS + cytological cutoff, the differences in CIN2 + and CIN3 + sensitivity between HC-II test and ThinPrep cytology were statistically not significant. Specificity of the ThinPrep cytology for any low and high grade histological lesions was clearly > 95% when cytological diagnosis LSIL + cutoff was used and nearly 100% when HSIL + cutoff was used. All these specificity estimates were high compared with HC-II test. The specificity of the ThinPrep cytology decreased with about 10% when ASCUS + was the cutoff. At cutoff ASCUS +, specificity of HC-II was comparable or only slightly lower than with ThinPrep ASCUS + cytology with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: ThinPrep smears and hr-HPV DNA detection by HC-II performed very well with regard to identifying high grade lesions. HPV DNA testing is a promising new technology for cervical cancer prevention and can be used for primary screening in conjunction with cervical cytology for women aged 30 years and older. (C) 2013 Middle East Fertility Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] HPV testing in primary cervical cancer screening: A Canadian experience
    Ratnam, S
    Franco, E
    [J]. EUROGIN 2003: 5TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONGRESS, 2003, : 43 - 45
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening: cytology versus human papillomavirus DNA testing
    van Rosmalen, J.
    de Kok, I. M. C. M.
    van Ballegooijen, M.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (06) : 699 - 709
  • [43] Comparison of primary cytology, primary HPV testing and co-testing as cervical cancer screening for Chinese women: a population-based screening cohort
    Li, Zhi-Fang
    Jia, Xin-Hua
    Feng, Xiangxian
    Zhang, Shaokai
    Zhang, Xun
    Pan, Qin-Jing
    Zou, Xun-Wen
    Hao, Yue-Qing
    Sun, Xi-Bin
    Qiao, You-Lin
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [44] Adoption of HPV testing as an adjunct to conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening in Japan
    Inoue, Masaki
    Okamura, Makoto
    Hashimoto, Shigeru
    Tango, Masahiro
    Ukita, Toshihiko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2010, 111 (02) : 110 - 114
  • [45] Primary HPV testing with cytology versus cytology alone in cervical screening - a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 2 rounds of screening in a Chinese population
    Chan, K. K. L.
    Ngu, S. F.
    Chu, M. Y.
    Tse, K. Y.
    Wei, N.
    Liu, S. S.
    Lau, L.
    Cheung, A. N.
    Ngan, H. Y. S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 10 - 10
  • [46] Primary HPV testing with cytology versus cytology alone in cervical screening-A prospective randomized controlled trial with two rounds of screening in a Chinese population
    Chan, Karen K. L.
    Liu, Stephanie S.
    Wei, Na
    Ngu, Siew F.
    Chu, Mandy M. Y.
    Tse, Ka Y.
    Lau, Lesley S. K.
    Cheung, Annie N. Y.
    Ngan, Hextan Y. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 147 (04) : 1152 - 1162
  • [47] Is cytology/HPV co-testing for cervical cancer screening useful in Japan?
    Oishi, Tetsuro
    Kigawa, Junzo
    Iwanari, Osamu
    Kasai, Tokuzo
    Kurokawa, Tetsuji
    Hamada, Masao
    Fujita, Hiromasa
    Fujiwara, Hiroyuki
    Yokoyama, Masatoshi
    Sakuragi, Noriaki
    Harada, Tasuku
    Suzuki, Mitsuaki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 158 (01) : 187 - 193
  • [48] Routine cervical screening with primary HPV testing and cytology triage protocol in a randomised setting
    Kotaniemi-Talonen, L
    Nieminen, P
    Anttila, A
    Hakama, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 93 (08) : 862 - 867
  • [49] Routine cervical screening with primary HPV testing and cytology triage protocol in a randomised setting
    L Kotaniemi-Talonen
    P Nieminen
    A Anttila
    M Hakama
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 93 : 862 - 867
  • [50] A Performance Evaluation of an Optoelectronic Cervical Screening Device in Comparison to Cytology and HPV DNA Testing
    Vet, Jessica N.
    Haindl, James P.
    Velasquez, Carolina
    Parker, Leonie J.
    Burns, Margaret, I
    Morrell, Stephen
    Campion, Michael J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 43 (02) : 213 - 218