Clinical validation of high risk HPV DNA testing versus ThinPrep cytology for primary cervical cancer screening

被引:1
|
作者
Aboul-Fotouh, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Hana, Ihab [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Menia Univ, Fac Med, OB GYN Dept, Al Minya, Egypt
[2] Taiba Hosp, OB GYN Dept, Kuwait, Kuwait
[3] Menia Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Al Minya, Egypt
[4] Taiba Hosp, Dept Pathol, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
HPV; HPV DNA testing; Pap smear; ThinPrep cytology; Cervial cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.mefs.2012.12.001
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective(s): To compare the validity of the high risk HPV DNA testing using the hybrid capture II technique (HC-II) to ThinPrep cytology for primary cervical cancer screening. Design: Cross sectional pilot study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taiba Hospital, Sabah Al Salem, Kuwait. Methods: Consecutive 1923 cervical smear samples were taken for ThinPrep cytological screening and hr-HPV DNA testing using HC-II assay. Histological diagnoses were obtained from a total of 426 women who had positive results on screening and a group of women with negative screening and suspicious cervix underwent colposcopy and directed biopsies, and those with cervical precancerous lesions or cancer received appropriate treatment. Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of screening methods. Results: HPV was found positive in 15.5% of cases. 19/22 cases (86.4.1 A) with a biopsy diagnosis of CIN2 + had a HC-II positive test. For CIN3, HC-II was positive in all cases (100%). Assuming a similar specificity level, the relative sensitivity of the HC-II test was higher when histologically confirmed high grade lesions (CIN2 + or CIN3 +) were observed. HC-II test had the best sensitivity when defining cases as CIN2 + or CIN3 + (98.7% and 100%, respectively). When using the ASCUS + cytological cutoff, the differences in CIN2 + and CIN3 + sensitivity between HC-II test and ThinPrep cytology were statistically not significant. Specificity of the ThinPrep cytology for any low and high grade histological lesions was clearly > 95% when cytological diagnosis LSIL + cutoff was used and nearly 100% when HSIL + cutoff was used. All these specificity estimates were high compared with HC-II test. The specificity of the ThinPrep cytology decreased with about 10% when ASCUS + was the cutoff. At cutoff ASCUS +, specificity of HC-II was comparable or only slightly lower than with ThinPrep ASCUS + cytology with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: ThinPrep smears and hr-HPV DNA detection by HC-II performed very well with regard to identifying high grade lesions. HPV DNA testing is a promising new technology for cervical cancer prevention and can be used for primary screening in conjunction with cervical cytology for women aged 30 years and older. (C) 2013 Middle East Fertility Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of HPV DNA Testing With Cytology Triage and/or Repeat HPV DNA Testing in Primary Cervical Cancer Screening
    Naucler, Pontus
    Ryd, Walter
    Tornberg, Sven
    Strand, Anders
    Wadell, Goran
    Elfgren, Kristina
    Radberg, Thomas
    Strander, Bjorn
    Forslund, Ola
    Hansson, Bengt-Goran
    Hagmar, Bjorn
    Johansson, Bo
    Rylander, Eva
    Dillner, Joakim
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (02) : 88 - 99
  • [2] The clinical research of Thinprep Cytology Test (TCT) combined with HPV-DNA detection in screening cervical cancer
    Liu, Y.
    Zhang, L.
    Zhao, G.
    Che, L.
    Zhang, H.
    Fang, J.
    [J]. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2017, 63 (02) : 92 - 95
  • [3] Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population
    Koliopoulos, George
    Nyaga, Victoria N.
    Santesso, Nancy
    Bryant, Andrew
    Martin-Hirsch, Pierre P. L.
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Schnemann, Holger
    Paraskevaidis, Evangelos
    Arbyn, Marc
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (08):
  • [4] PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RISK HPV DNA GENOTYPING FOR PRIMARY CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING AND TRIAGE, COMPARED TO CYTOLOGY.
    Chatzistamatiou, K.
    Kaufmann, A. M.
    Jansen-Duerr, P.
    Skenderi, A.
    Angelidou, S.
    Katsiki, E.
    Agorastos, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2015, 25 (09) : 971 - 971
  • [5] Validation of high-risk HPV tests for primary cervical screening
    Meijer, C. J. L. M.
    Berkhof, H.
    Heideman, D. A. M.
    Hesselink, A. T.
    Snijders, P. J. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2009, 46 : S1 - S4
  • [6] HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening
    Ronco, Guglielmo
    Segnan, Nereo
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 370 (9601): : 1740 - 1742
  • [7] HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening
    不详
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2008, 16 (32) : 194 - 195
  • [8] HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening
    Wright, Thomas C., Jr.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 95 : S239 - S246
  • [9] Cervical HPV testing versus cytology
    Burki, Talha Khan
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (08): : E390 - E390
  • [10] HPV DNA testing with cytology triage in cervical cancer screening: Influence of revealing HPV infection status
    Richardson, Lyndsay Ann
    El-Zein, Mariam
    Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V.
    Ratnam, Samuel
    Sangwa-Lugoma, Ghislain
    Longatto-Filho, Adhemar
    Cardoso, Marly Augusto
    Coutlee, Francois
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 123 (12) : 745 - 754