CDMRP: FOSTERING INNOVATION THROUGH PEER REVIEW

被引:2
|
作者
Kaime, E. Melissa [1 ]
Moore, Katherine H. [1 ]
Goldberg, Steven F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Congressionally Directed Med Res Programs, 1077 Patchel St, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
[2] SRA Int, Ctr Peer Review & Sci Management, Frederick, MD USA
关键词
Peer review; Innovation; Consumer involvement;
D O I
10.3727/194982410X12895770314159
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) is a collection of 18 individual programs that seek to find and fund the best research to eradicate diseases and support the warfighter for the benefit of the American public. In fulfilling its mission, CDMRP emphasizes innovative, high-risk, high-gain research that might otherwise not be funded and projects that forge new collaborations in furtherance of important research objectives. Research proposals (applications) are reviewed using a two-tiered process that includes peer review panels that evaluate scientific merit, innovation, and impact, followed by an external review that makes funding recommendations based on programmatic intent and portfolio balance. At both levels of review, CDMRP's processes are distinguished by the inclusion of consumer advocates, who are integral to the program's ability to focus on research that will have an impact on the communities affected by the relevant illness, injury, or disorder. Scientific peer review is executed using a dynamic and flexible process and produces a robust and comprehensive summary statement that serves as the basis for the second tier of review, informs subsequent award negotiations, and provides valuable feedback to all applicants. In combination with a strong commitment to integrity and transparency, CDMRP's peer review processes support the organization's mission to fund innovative, high-impact research.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FOSTERING REVISION OF ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING THROUGH STRUCTURED PEER ASSESSMENT
    Tsai, Ya-Chin
    Chuang, Min-Tun
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2013, 116 (01) : 210 - 221
  • [22] FOSTERING GLOBAL CONNECTIONS THROUGH VIRTUAL INTERNATIONAL PEER EXCHANGE
    Lipszyc-Arroyo, Clara
    [J]. INTED2012: INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2012, : 5487 - 5493
  • [23] Fostering online social capital through peer-support
    Fetter, Sibren
    Van Der Vegt, Wim
    Sloep, Peter
    [J]. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 2015, 11 (3-4) : 290 - 304
  • [24] Fostering Innovation
    Gonnering, Russell S.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 30 (06): : 449 - 449
  • [25] FOSTERING INNOVATION
    FLORIDA, R
    BROWDY, D
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1992, 95 (02): : 7 - 7
  • [26] FOSTERING INNOVATION
    Young, Stanley D.
    [J]. CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2010, 88 (10) : 4 - 4
  • [27] Fostering innovation
    Jagger, Anna
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 2013, 77 (05) : 37 - 37
  • [28] Fostering Innovation
    Wallace, Sara
    [J]. NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2017, 129 (04) : 9 - 10
  • [29] Fostering Social Innovation through Multiple Social Media Combinations
    Charalabidis, Yannis
    Loukis, Euripidis
    Androutsopoulou, Aggeliki
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 31 (03) : 225 - 239
  • [30] Fostering regional innovation, entrepreneurship and growth through public procurement
    Jon Mikel Zabala-Iturriagagoitia
    [J]. Small Business Economics, 2022, 58 : 1205 - 1222