CDMRP: FOSTERING INNOVATION THROUGH PEER REVIEW

被引:2
|
作者
Kaime, E. Melissa [1 ]
Moore, Katherine H. [1 ]
Goldberg, Steven F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Congressionally Directed Med Res Programs, 1077 Patchel St, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
[2] SRA Int, Ctr Peer Review & Sci Management, Frederick, MD USA
关键词
Peer review; Innovation; Consumer involvement;
D O I
10.3727/194982410X12895770314159
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP) is a collection of 18 individual programs that seek to find and fund the best research to eradicate diseases and support the warfighter for the benefit of the American public. In fulfilling its mission, CDMRP emphasizes innovative, high-risk, high-gain research that might otherwise not be funded and projects that forge new collaborations in furtherance of important research objectives. Research proposals (applications) are reviewed using a two-tiered process that includes peer review panels that evaluate scientific merit, innovation, and impact, followed by an external review that makes funding recommendations based on programmatic intent and portfolio balance. At both levels of review, CDMRP's processes are distinguished by the inclusion of consumer advocates, who are integral to the program's ability to focus on research that will have an impact on the communities affected by the relevant illness, injury, or disorder. Scientific peer review is executed using a dynamic and flexible process and produces a robust and comprehensive summary statement that serves as the basis for the second tier of review, informs subsequent award negotiations, and provides valuable feedback to all applicants. In combination with a strong commitment to integrity and transparency, CDMRP's peer review processes support the organization's mission to fund innovative, high-impact research.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FOSTERING LEARNING THROUGH PEER REVIEW: EXPERIENCES AND REFLECTIONS WITH MASTER STUDENTS
    Grion, V.
    Serbati, A.
    Tino, C.
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 626 - 631
  • [2] Peer review and innovation
    Spier, RE
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2002, 8 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [3] Peer review and innovation
    Raymond Spier
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2002, 8 : 99 - 108
  • [4] Fostering Innovation Through Organizational Culture
    Zostautiene, Daiva
    Susniene, Dalia
    Liberiene, Jurgita
    [J]. VISION 2025: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIONS THROUGH SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE, 2019, : 760 - 771
  • [5] Fostering innovation through academia collaboration
    Institute for System Level Integration
    不详
    [J]. Adv Packag, 2007, 1 (18):
  • [6] Fostering Innovation Through STEM Support
    Challener, Cynthia
    [J]. JCT COATINGSTECH, 2016, 13 (11) : 34 - 43
  • [7] FOSTERING INNOVATION THROUGH EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
    Siddique, Zahed
    Hardre, Patricia
    Bradshaw, Amy
    Saha, Mrinal
    Mistree, Farrokh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, DETC 2010, VOL 6, 2010, : 791 - 803
  • [8] Fostering innovation through cultural change
    Leong, Julia
    Anderson, Craig
    [J]. LIBRARY MANAGEMENT, 2012, 33 (8-9) : 490 - 497
  • [9] Fostering Educational Innovation Through Measuring Outcomes
    Eileen E. Reynolds
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011, 26 : 1241 - 1242
  • [10] Fostering Educational Innovation Through Measuring Outcomes
    Reynolds, Eileen E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 (11) : 1241 - 1242