EFFECT OF PRESCALDING BRUSHING ON CONTAMINATION LEVEL OF PORK CARCASSES DURING THE SLAUGHTERING PROCESS

被引:12
|
作者
RAHKIO, M [1 ]
KORKEALA, H [1 ]
SIPPOLA, I [1 ]
PELTONEN, M [1 ]
机构
[1] ITIKKA LIHAPOLAR CO, SF-60550 NURMO, FINLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0309-1740(92)90104-C
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The number of aerobic bacteria on the skin of pork carcasses was measured at seven different points on the slaughtering line in order to study the hygienic effect of pre-scalding brushing on the contamination level of carcasses. Eighty carcasses were investigated, of which 40 were brushed before scalding and 40 served as controls. Samples were excised from three sites: back, abdomen and ham. The total number of samples was 1368. The cleaning monitoring of the pre-scalding brushing machine and the blackscraping machine was done at the same time. After singeing and blackscraping there were significant differences (P < 0.05) between brushed and non-brushed ham sites. After singeing, brushed ham sites had a contamination level of 2.11 (log10 cm-2) and non-brushed ham sites a level of 1.57. After blackscraping the contamination of brushed ham sites was 3.45 (log10 cm-2) and that of non-brushed ham sites 3.26. At the end of the slaughtering line brushed carcasses were more contaminated than those not brushed, although this difference was not significant.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 183
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [11] Complex Internal Microstructure of Feather Follicles on Chicken Skin Promotes the Bacterial Cross-Contamination of Carcasses During the Slaughtering Process
    Zhang, Xibin
    Peng, Zixin
    Li, Peng
    Mao, Yanwei
    Shen, Ru
    Tao, Rui
    Diao, Xiuguo
    Liu, Longhai
    Zhao, Yuzhong
    Luo, Xin
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [12] Decontamination of pork carcasses during scalding and the prevention of Salmonella cross-contamination
    Bolton, DJ
    Pearce, R
    Sheridan, JJ
    McDowell, DA
    Blair, IS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 94 (06) : 1036 - 1042
  • [13] A comparison between broiler chicken carcasses with and without visible faecal contamination during the slaughtering process on hazard identification of Salmonella spp.
    Jiménez, SM
    Salsi, MS
    Tiburzi, MC
    Pirovani, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 93 (04) : 593 - 598
  • [14] THE CONTAMINATION OF PORK WITH SPOILAGE BACTERIA DURING COMMERCIAL DRESSING, CHILLING AND CUTTING OF PIG CARCASSES
    GILL, CO
    BRYANT, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 16 (01) : 51 - 62
  • [15] Comparison of hot water wash and trimming of pork carcasses for reducing the level bacterial contamination.
    Rheault, N
    Quessy, S
    [J]. CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 1999, 40 (11): : 792 - 795
  • [16] BACTERIOLOGICAL SURVEY ON THE SURFACE CONTAMINATION OF BROILERS DURING THE SLAUGHTERING-PROCESS
    DEZEUREWALLAYS, B
    VANHOOF, J
    [J]. VLAAMS DIERGENEESKUNDIG TIJDSCHRIFT, 1982, 51 (04): : 313 - 334
  • [17] Changes of Spoilage Bacteria on the Surface of Broiler Carcasses during the Efficient Slaughtering Process of Yellow Feather Chicken
    Shi, Jinming
    Wang, Xiaoming
    Li, Lingyun
    Dong, Huafa
    Liu, Yafu
    [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45 (06) : 142 - 149
  • [18] Evaluation of effect of chilling steps during slaughtering on the Campylobacter sp. counts on broiler carcasses
    Stella, Simone
    Tirloni, Erica
    Bernardi, Cristian
    Grilli, Guido
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (03)
  • [19] Risks and prevention of contamination of beef carcasses during the slaughter process in the United States of America
    Galland, JC
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE DE L OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 1997, 16 (02): : 395 - 404
  • [20] Identification of risk factors for Campylobacter contamination levels on broiler carcasses during the slaughter process
    Seliwiorstow, Tomasz
    Bare, Julie
    Berkvens, Dirk
    Van Damme, Inge
    Uyttendaele, Mieke
    De Zutter, Lieven
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 226 : 26 - 32