ABOUT LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT - IMPACT OF PHYSICIANS BEHAVIORS ON THE FAMILY

被引:152
|
作者
TILDEN, VP
TOLLE, SW
GARLAND, MJ
NELSON, CA
机构
[1] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,SCH NURSING,PORTLAND,OR 97201
[2] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,SCH NURSING OFF RES DEV & UTILIZAT,PORTLAND,OR 97201
[3] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,DIV GEN INTERNAL MED,PORTLAND,OR 97201
[4] OREGON HLTH SCI UNIV,DEPT PUBL HLTH & PREVENT MED,PORTLAND,OR 97201
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.155.6.633
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the growing availability of advance directives, most patients in the intensive care unit lack written directives, and, therefore, consultation with families about treatment decisions remains the rule. In the context of decision making about withdrawing life-sustaining treatments, we investigated which physician and nurse behaviors families find supportive and which behaviors increase the family's burden. Methods: We conducted intensive 1- to 2-hour-long individual interviews using a semistructured interview protocol with 32 family members of patients without advance directives whose deaths followed a stay in the intensive care unit and withdrawal of treatment. We analyzed more than 700 pages of verbatim interview data using content analysis techniques and achieved more than 90% interrater agreement on data codes. Results: Themes emerged as families identified selected physician and nursing behaviors as helpful: encouraging advanced planning, timely communication, clarification of families' roles, facilitating family consensus, and accommodating family's grief. Behaviors that made families feel excluded or increased their burden included postponing discussions about treatment withdrawal, delaying withdrawal once scheduled, placing the full burden of decision making on one person, withdrawing from the family, and defining death as a failure. Conclusions: Study findings provide an increased understanding of the unmet needs of families and serve to guide physicians and nurses in reducing actions that increase families' burdens as they participate in treatment withdrawal decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 638
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] STABILITY OF CHOICES ABOUT LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS
    DANIS, M
    GARRETT, J
    HARRIS, R
    PATRICK, DL
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (07) : 567 - 573
  • [32] COMMENTARY ON DISCUSSIONS ABOUT LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENTS
    EMANUEL, EJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ETHICS, 1994, 5 (03): : 250 - 256
  • [33] Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment
    Ackermann, RJ
    [J]. AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2000, 62 (07) : 1555 - 1560
  • [34] Refusing emergency life-sustaining treatment
    Coates, J
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 114 (1124) : 18 - 18
  • [35] POLICIES TO LIMIT LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT
    SABATINO, F
    [J]. HOSPITALS, 1991, 65 (20): : 48 - &
  • [36] Preventing Life-Sustaining Treatment by Default
    Braun, Ursula K.
    McCullough, Laurence B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2011, 9 (03) : 250 - 256
  • [37] Children: withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment
    Brannan, Sophie
    Campbell, Ruth
    Davies, Martin
    English, Veronica
    Mussell, Rebecca
    Sheather, Julian C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 44 (04) : 285 - 286
  • [38] Terminating life-sustaining treatment of the demented
    Callahan, D
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1995, 25 (06) : 25 - 31
  • [39] RIGHT TO REFUSE LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT
    GUSTAITIS, R
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 1988, 81 (02) : 317 - 321
  • [40] PHYSICIANS' OPINIONS ABOUT WITHDRAWING VS. WITHHOLDING LIFE-SUSTAINING TREATMENT AT THE END OF LIFE: FINDINGS FROM A NATIONAL PHYSICIAN SURVEY
    Chung, G. S.
    Rasinski, K. A.
    Curlin, F. A.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2013, 53 : 502 - 502