FORAGING BEHAVIOR BY MULE DEER - THE INFLUENCE OF CATTLE GRAZING

被引:68
|
作者
KIE, JG [1 ]
EVANS, CJ [1 ]
LOFT, ER [1 ]
MENKE, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, DEPT AGRON & RANGE SCI, DAVIS, CA 95616 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 1991年 / 55卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3809516
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We studied the effects of different cattle stocking rates on activity patterns of female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) on a summer range in the Sierra Nevada of California. Using an automated telemetry system, we determined that deer averaged 32 +/- 2.2 (SE)% of the time feeding, 8 +/- 1.1% traveling, and 60 +/- 2.4% resting per 24-hour period. Deer spent more time feeding and less time resting with increased cattle stocking rates. During 1984, a year of average precipitation, deer spent more time feeding per day in late summer than in early summer in range units grazed by cattle but did not do so in ungrazed range units. In 1985, a drier year, deer spent less time feeding per day in late summer in grazed range units. Time spent feeding by deer was negatively correlated with standing crop of herbaceous forage in meadow-riparian habitats. Deer increased their time spent feeding by shortening the length of resting bouts and including more feeding bouts each day, not by increasing the length of each foraging bout. Companion studies indicated that with cattle grazing, deer home-range sizes were larger (Loft 1988), and hiding cover for fawns was reduced (Loft et al. 1987). The results are consistent with the hypothesis that cattle competed with deer, particularly at high stocking rates and during a year of below-average precipitation. We suggest that female mule deer were acting as time-minimizers to meet the high energetic demands of lactation while minimizing their exposure to predators. Management options to reduce adverse effects include reducing or eliminating cattle grazing during early summer on all or part of the grazing allotment.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 674
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Grazing Allometry: Anatomy, Movement, and Foraging Behavior of Three Cattle Breeds of Different Productivity
    Pauler, Caren M.
    Isselstein, Johannes
    Berard, Joel
    Braunbeck, Thomas
    Schneider, Manuel K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [42] Mule deer and elk foraging preference for 4 sage-brush taxa
    Wambolt, CL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1996, 49 (06): : 499 - 503
  • [43] Apprehension affecting foraging patterns and landscape use of mule deer in arid environments
    Juan Pablo Esparza-Carlos
    John W. Laundré
    Lucina Hernández
    Luis Ignacio Íñiguez-Dávalos
    [J]. Mammalian Biology, 2016, 81 : 543 - 550
  • [44] Forage choice in pasturelands: Influence on cattle foraging behavior and performance
    Villalba, J. J.
    Cabassu, R.
    Gunter, S. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (04) : 1729 - 1740
  • [45] Apprehension affecting foraging patterns and landscape use of mule deer in arid environments
    Pablo Eparza-Carlos, Juan
    Laundre, John W.
    Hernandez, Lucina
    Ignacio Iniguez-Davalos, Luis
    [J]. MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY, 2016, 81 (06) : 543 - 550
  • [46] Effects of distribution, behavior, and climate on mule deer survival
    Schuyler, Elizabeth M.
    Dugger, Katie M.
    Jackson, Dewaine H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 83 (01): : 89 - 99
  • [47] Forage Quality's Influence on Mule Deer Fawns
    Tollefson, Troy N.
    Shipley, Lisa A.
    Myers, Woodrow L.
    Dasgupta, Nairanjana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 75 (04): : 919 - 928
  • [48] A simple index of standard operative temperature for mule deer and cattle in winter
    Beaver, JM
    Olson, BE
    Wraith, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 21 (5-6) : 345 - 352
  • [49] DIETS OF WILD HORSES, CATTLE, AND MULE DEER IN PICEANCE BASIN, COLORADO
    HUBBARD, RE
    HANSEN, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1976, 29 (05): : 389 - 392
  • [50] CRUDE TERPENOID INFLUENCE ON MULE DEER PREFERENCE FOR SAGEBRUSH
    PERSONIUS, TL
    WAMBOLT, CL
    STEPHENS, JR
    KELSEY, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1987, 40 (01): : 84 - 88