FORAGING BEHAVIOR BY MULE DEER - THE INFLUENCE OF CATTLE GRAZING

被引:68
|
作者
KIE, JG [1 ]
EVANS, CJ [1 ]
LOFT, ER [1 ]
MENKE, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, DEPT AGRON & RANGE SCI, DAVIS, CA 95616 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 1991年 / 55卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3809516
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We studied the effects of different cattle stocking rates on activity patterns of female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) on a summer range in the Sierra Nevada of California. Using an automated telemetry system, we determined that deer averaged 32 +/- 2.2 (SE)% of the time feeding, 8 +/- 1.1% traveling, and 60 +/- 2.4% resting per 24-hour period. Deer spent more time feeding and less time resting with increased cattle stocking rates. During 1984, a year of average precipitation, deer spent more time feeding per day in late summer than in early summer in range units grazed by cattle but did not do so in ungrazed range units. In 1985, a drier year, deer spent less time feeding per day in late summer in grazed range units. Time spent feeding by deer was negatively correlated with standing crop of herbaceous forage in meadow-riparian habitats. Deer increased their time spent feeding by shortening the length of resting bouts and including more feeding bouts each day, not by increasing the length of each foraging bout. Companion studies indicated that with cattle grazing, deer home-range sizes were larger (Loft 1988), and hiding cover for fawns was reduced (Loft et al. 1987). The results are consistent with the hypothesis that cattle competed with deer, particularly at high stocking rates and during a year of below-average precipitation. We suggest that female mule deer were acting as time-minimizers to meet the high energetic demands of lactation while minimizing their exposure to predators. Management options to reduce adverse effects include reducing or eliminating cattle grazing during early summer on all or part of the grazing allotment.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 674
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HABITAT SHIFTS BY MULE DEER - THE INFLUENCE OF CATTLE GRAZING
    LOFT, ER
    MENKE, JW
    KIE, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1991, 55 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [2] The effects of cattle grazing on optimal foraging in mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
    Kie, JG
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 88 (1-2) : 131 - 138
  • [3] EFFECT OF BURNING OR CLIPPING AGROPYRONSPICATUM IN THE AUTUMN ON THE SPRING FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF MULE DEER AND CATTLE
    WILLMS, W
    BAILEY, AW
    MCLEAN, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1980, 17 (01) : 69 - 84
  • [4] EFFECTS OF CATTLE GRAZING ON SELECTED HABITATS OF SOUTHERN MULE DEER
    BOWYER, RT
    BLEICH, VC
    [J]. CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME, 1984, 70 (04): : 240 - 247
  • [5] EFFECTS OF CATTLE GRAZING ON MULE DEER DIET AND AREA SELECTION
    AUSTIN, DD
    URNESS, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1986, 39 (01): : 18 - 21
  • [6] Spring cattle grazing and mule deer nutrition in a bluebunch wheatgrass community
    Wagoner, Sara J.
    Shipley, Lisa A.
    Cook, Rachel C.
    Hardesty, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 77 (05): : 897 - 907
  • [7] Landscape simulation of foraging by elk, mule deer and cattle on summer range
    Ager, AA
    Johnson, BK
    Coe, PK
    Wisdom, MJ
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE SIXTY-NINTH NORTH AMERICAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL RESOURCES CONFERENCE, 2004, 69 : 687 - 707
  • [8] Elk, mule deer, and cattle foraging relationships on foothill and mountain rangeland
    Torstenson, WLF
    Mosley, JC
    Brewer, TK
    Tess, MW
    Knight, JE
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 59 (01) : 80 - 87
  • [9] Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer
    Altendorf, KB
    Laundré, JW
    Gonzalez, CAL
    Brown, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2001, 82 (02) : 430 - 439
  • [10] INFLUENCE OF REST-ROTATION CATTLE GRAZING ON MULE DEER AND ELK HABITAT USE IN EAST-CENTRAL IDAHO
    YEO, JJ
    PEEK, JM
    WITTINGER, WT
    KVALE, CT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1993, 46 (03): : 245 - 250