Can stochastic discount factor models explain the cross-section of equity returns?

被引:0
|
作者
Abhakorn, Pongrapeeporn [1 ]
Smith, Peter N. [2 ]
Wickens, Michael R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Finance Thailand, Fiscal Policy Off, Phayatai Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ York, Cardiff Business Sch, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
Risk premium; Equity return; Stochastic discount factor; No-arbitrage condition;
D O I
10.1016/j.rfe.2016.01.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We propose a multivariate test of the capital asset pricing model (C-CAPM) of the cross-sectional variation in equity returns in which we compare cross-sectional variation in equity returns to the cross-sectional variation in their conditional covariance with stochastic discount factors. We use a multivariate generalized heteroskedasticity in mean model to estimate 25 portfolios that are formed on size and the book-to-market ratio. Each portfolio is allowed to have its own no-arbitrage condition. We find that although the conditional covariances of returns with consumption exhibit negative variation across size, they do not vary across the book-to-market ratio. Thus, C-CAPM can capture the size effect, but not the value effect. The fit is, however, improved by allowing the coefficients on the consumption covariances to be different. The value effect appears to be associated with the book-to-market ratio as well as size. On its own the book-to-market ratio does not generate additional information about average returns to C-CAPM. A possible explanation for these findings is that both small and low book-to-market ratio firms are expected to have higher rates of growth. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 68
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The ordering of historical returns and the cross-section of subsequent returns
    Mohrschladt, Hannes
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2021, 125
  • [42] Expectations and the cross-section of stock returns
    LaPorta, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1996, 51 (05): : 1715 - 1742
  • [43] Cross-section of option returns and volatility
    Goyal, Amit
    Saretto, Alessio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 94 (02) : 310 - 326
  • [44] Seasonality in the cross-section of stock returns
    Heston, Steven L.
    Sadka, Ronnie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 87 (02) : 418 - 445
  • [45] New Methods for the Cross-Section of Returns
    Karolyi, G. Andrew
    Van Nieuwerburgh, Stijn
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 33 (05): : 1879 - 1890
  • [46] Seasonality in the Cross-Section of Cryptocurrency Returns
    Long, Huaigang
    Zaremba, Adam
    Demir, Ender
    Szczygielski, Jan Jakub
    Vasenin, Mikhail
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 35
  • [47] The cross-section of volatility and expected returns
    Ang, A
    Hodrick, RJ
    Xing, YH
    Zhang, XY
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (01): : 259 - 299
  • [48] Mispricing and the cross-section of stock returns
    Chen C.R.
    Lung P.P.
    Wang F.A.
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2009, 32 (4) : 317 - 349
  • [49] Can An 'Estimation Factor' Help Explain Cross-Sectional Returns?
    Lundtofte, Frederik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2009, 36 (5-6) : 705 - 724
  • [50] Day of the week and the cross-section of returns
    Birru, Justin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 130 (01) : 182 - 214