THE INTERACTION BETWEEN PRENATAL STRESS AND NEONATAL HANDLING ON NOCICEPTIVE RESPONSE LATENCIES IN MALE AND FEMALE RATS

被引:71
|
作者
SMYTHE, JW [1 ]
MCCORMICK, CM [1 ]
ROCHFORD, J [1 ]
MEANEY, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] BATES COLL,DEPT PSYCHOL,LEWISTON,ME 04240
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
PAW LICK; NEONATAL; HANDLING; PRENATAL; STRESS; SEX DIFFERENCES; NOCICEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/0031-9384(94)90089-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Neonatal handling produces physiological and behavioral changes that persist into adulthood. These effects are opposite to those resulting from prenatal stress (PS). We examined the interaction between PS and handling on nociception in adult male and female rats. Randomly selected pregnant rats were subjected to restraint stress on days 13-17 of gestation for 25 min each day, or left undisturbed. At birth, selected stressed/nonstressed litters were assigned to be handled. Handling consisted of 15 min of separation from the dam, once per day, from postnatal days 1-14. At 4 months of age, rats were placed on a 50 degrees C hot plate, and their latencies to paw lick were recorded. Prenatal stress and handling interacted to affect latencies in male rats. Handled (H)/PS rats had significantly lower paw lick latencies than nonhandled (NH)/PS rats (p < 0.05). However, handling had no effect on the male offspring of control dams. Handling elevated paw lick latencies in the female offspring of control dams, an effect that was most pronounced in diestrous vs. estrous rats. The NH/PS rats showed significantly elevated latencies compared to NH/NS rats (p < 0.05). These results suggest that handling effects on nociception are most apparent in rats subjected to PS; in males at least, these effects would otherwise not be present.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 974
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Neonatal stress alters LTP in freely moving male and female adult rats
    Kehoe, P
    Bronzino, JD
    HIPPOCAMPUS, 1999, 9 (06) : 651 - 658
  • [22] Could neonatal testosterone replacement prevent alterations induced by prenatal stress in male rats?
    Pereira, OCM
    Bernardi, MM
    Gerardin, DCC
    LIFE SCIENCES, 2006, 78 (24) : 2767 - 2771
  • [23] Effects of prenatal stress and neonatal handling on anxiety, spatial learning and serotonergic system of male offspring mice
    Akatsu, Shigemi
    Ishikawa, Chihiro
    Takemura, Kaori
    Ohtani, Akiko
    Shiga, Takashi
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2015, 101 : 15 - 23
  • [24] Prenatal stress exacerbates the impact of an aversive procedure on the corticosterone response to stress in female rats
    Louvart, Helene
    Maccari, Stefania
    Vaiva, Guillaume
    Darnaudery, Muriel
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2009, 34 (05) : 786 - 790
  • [25] Differences in Hemodynamic Responses to Stress Between Male and Female Rats
    Chen, Fangping
    Mullenax, Heather
    Sharma, Puneet
    Finkel, Mitchell S.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23
  • [26] Effect of Chronic Stress on Immune Response and Behavior in Female and Male Mice Subject to Prenatal Stress
    Pascuan, C. G.
    Palumbo, M. L.
    Genaro, A. M.
    NEUROIMMUNOMODULATION, 2011, 18 (06) : 395 - 396
  • [27] Effect of prenatal stress and gonadal hormone condition on depressive behaviors of female and male rats
    Frye, CA
    Wawrzycki, J
    HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2003, 44 (04) : 319 - 326
  • [28] Early and long-term neuroendocrine effects of prenatal stress in male and female rats
    Reznikov A.G.
    Nosenko N.D.
    Tarasenko L.V.
    Sinitsyn P.V.
    Polyakova L.I.
    Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 2001, 31 (1) : 1 - 5
  • [29] Effects of perinatal diet and prenatal stress on the behavioural profile of aged male and female rats
    Bengoetxea, Xabier
    Paternain, Laura
    Martisova, Eva
    Milagro, Fermin I.
    Alfredo Martinez, J.
    Campion, Javier
    Ramirez, Maria J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 31 (03) : 356 - 364
  • [30] PRENATAL STRESS ALTERS MORPHINE-INDUCED AND STRESS-INDUCED ANALGESIA IN MALE AND FEMALE RATS
    KINSLEY, CH
    MANN, PE
    BRIDGES, RS
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1988, 30 (01) : 123 - 128