GEOID UNDULATION ACCURACY

被引:11
|
作者
RAPP, RH
机构
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 1993年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1109/36.214912
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The determination of the geoid, and equipotential surface of the Earth's gravity field, has long been of interest to geodesists and oceanographers. The geoid provides a surface to which the actual ocean surface can be compared with the differences implying information on the circulation patterns of the oceans. For use in oceanographic applications the geoid is ideally needed to a high accuracy and to a high resolution. There are applications that require geoid undulation information to an accuracy of +/- 10 cm with a resolution of 50 km. We are far from this goal today but substantial improvement in geoid determination has been made. In 1979 the cumulative geoid undulation error to spherical harmonic degree 20 was +/- 1. 4 m for the GEM10 potential coefficient model. Today the corresponding value has been reduced to +/- 25 cm for GEM-T3 or +/- 11 cm for the OSU91A model. Similar improvements are noted by harmonic degree (wave-length) and in resolution. For example, in 1979 satellite potential coefficient models to degree 20 were available while today models to degree 50 exist. Potential coefficient models now exist to degree 360 based on a combination of data types. This paper discusses the accuracy changes that have taken place in the past 12 years in the determination of geoid undulations.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 370
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influencing factors on the accuracy of local geoid model
    Jalal, Shazad Jamal
    Musa, Tajul Ariffin
    Din, Ami Hassan Md
    Aris, Wan Anom Wan
    Shen, WenBin
    Pa'suya, Muhammad Faiz
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2019, 10 (06) : 439 - 445
  • [32] Influencing factors on the accuracy of local geoid model
    Shazad Jamal Jalal
    Tajul Ariffin Musa
    Ami Hassan Md Din
    Wan Anom Wan Aris
    WenBin Shen
    Muhammad Faiz Pa'suya
    Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2019, (06) : 439 - 445
  • [33] Influencing factors on the accuracy of local geoid model
    Shazad Jamal Jalal
    Tajul Ariffin Musa
    Ami Hassan Md Din
    Wan Anom Wan Aris
    WenBin Shen
    Muhammad Faiz Pasuya
    GeodesyandGeodynamics, 2019, 10 (06) : 439 - 445
  • [34] Investigation of the Geoid Model Accuracy Improvement in Turkey
    Isik, Mustafa Serkan
    Erol, Serdar
    Erol, Bihter
    JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (03)
  • [35] Accuracy assessment of the available geoid models in Algeria
    Daho, S. A. Benahmed
    Fairhead, J. D.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2007, 33 (01) : 76 - 82
  • [36] Improving the geoid accuracy by adapting the reference field
    Abd-Elmotaal, HA
    Kühtreiber, N
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH PART A-SOLID EARTH AND GEODESY, 1999, 24 (01): : 53 - 59
  • [37] GGMCalc a software for calculation of the geoid undulation and the height anomaly using the iteration method, and classical gravity anomaly
    Moazezi, Siamak
    Zomorrodian, Hossein
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2012, 5 (02) : 123 - 136
  • [38] GGMCalc a software for calculation of the geoid undulation and the height anomaly using the iteration method, and classical gravity anomaly
    Siamak Moazezi
    Hossein Zomorrodian
    Earth Science Informatics, 2012, 5 : 123 - 136
  • [39] Investigation into the Effects of Different Parameters on Geoid Modeling Accuracy
    Marotta, Giuliano Sant'Anna
    de Medeiros, Danilo Fernandes
    Guimaraes, Gabriel do Nascimento
    Erol, Bihter
    JOURNAL OF SURVEYING ENGINEERING, 2024, 150 (02)
  • [40] ACCURACY ASSESSMENT AND COMPARISON OF INTERPOLATION METHODS ON GEOID MODELS
    Radanovic, Marko
    Basic, Tomislav
    GEODETSKI VESTNIK, 2018, 62 (01) : 68 - 78