Collective action through online networks: Online Creation Communities for the construction of digital public goods

被引:0
|
作者
Fuster Morell, Mayo
机构
关键词
Online Creation Communities; digital commons; Governanze; participation; Social Forums; Wikipedia; Flickt; Wikihow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Online Creation Communities (OCCs) can be defined as networks of individuals that communicate, interact and collaborate; in several forms and degrees of participation which are eco-systemically integrated; mainly via a platform of participation on the Internet, on which they depend; and aiming at knowledge-making and sharing. This article analyses the conception of participation and the organizational logic of participation in OCCs. Participation in OCCs does not follow a dichotomize approach, but function more as an eco-system. The more significant characteristic of participation in OCCs are: 1) What is important is that the system is open to participation, but it is not expected that everybody participate and contribute equally; 2) Participation has multiple forms and degrees which are integrated. A critical mass of active developers is essential to initiate the project and maintain the content; weak cooperation enriches the system and facilitates reaching larger fields of information resources; and lurker or non-participants provide value as audience or though unintended participation that improve the system; 3) Participation is decentralized and asynchronous; 4) Participation is in public; 5) Participation is autonomous in the sense that each person decides which level of commitment they want to adopt and on what aspects they want to contribute. 6) Participation is not only deliberation but implementation. To conclude, an analysis of the governance conditions under which the resulting outcome could be defined as a digital commons is included. Furthermore, a reflection on the political implications of CCOs is also provided. The analysis is developed over the case studies of a platform provided by the European Social Forum, Flickr, Wikihow and Wikipedia. The main empirical methods are interviews, virtual ethnography and content analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 247
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Value co-creation in online healthcare communities
    Shirazi, Farid
    Wu, Yun
    Hajli, Ali
    Zadeh, Arash H.
    Hajli, Nick
    Lin, Xiaolin
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 167
  • [32] Creativity and co-creation in different online communities
    Naydonova, Lyubov M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 58 : 661 - 661
  • [33] Assessing knowledge construction in online learning communities
    Derry, SJ
    DuRussel, LA
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: OPEN LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: NEW COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES TO SUPPORT LEARNING, EXPLORATION AND COLLABORATION, 1999, 50 : 431 - 438
  • [34] Public policy action center online
    不详
    [J]. NURSING AND HEALTH CARE PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 22 (06): : 332 - 332
  • [35] Collective iteration behavior for online social networks
    Liu, Jian-Guo
    Li, Ren-De
    Guo, Qiang
    Zhang, Yi-Cheng
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2018, 499 : 490 - 497
  • [36] Editorial: Populism in and Through Online Communities
    Hinck, Ashley
    [J]. MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 2022, 10 (04): : 105 - 108
  • [37] Collective action in electronic networks of practice: An empirical study of three online social structures
    Landqvist, F
    Teigland, R
    [J]. COMMUNITIES AND TECHNOLOGIES 2005, 2005, : 359 - 375
  • [38] Digital Outburst: The Expression of a Social Crisis through Online Social Networks
    Cardenas, Juan Pablo
    Urbina, Carolina
    Vidal, Gerardo
    Olivares, Gaston
    Fuentes, Miguel
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2022, 2022
  • [39] The psychology of online activism and social movements: relations between online and offline collective action
    Greijdanus, Hedy
    Fernandes, Carlos A. de Matos
    Turner-Zwinkels, Felicity
    Honari, Ali
    Roos, Carla A.
    Rosenbusch, Hannes
    Postmes, Tom
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 35 : 49 - 54
  • [40] Collective Redress for Aviation Through Online Platforms
    Defossez, Delphine
    [J]. AIR & SPACE LAW, 2020, 45 (4-5): : 391 - 409