CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF THE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD WITH THE UNIPOLAR IMPLANTABLE DEFIBRILLATION SYSTEM

被引:65
|
作者
RAITT, MH [1 ]
JOHNSON, G [1 ]
DOLACK, GL [1 ]
POOLE, JE [1 ]
KUDENCHUK, PJ [1 ]
BARDY, GH [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON, DEPT MED, DIV CARDIOL, SEATTLE, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0735-1097(95)00093-J
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between clinical variables and the defibrillation threshold by using a standardized testing protocol and a uniform implantable defibrillator system. Background. Past studies have not revealed useful correlations between clinical variables and the energy required to terminate ventricular fibrillation. Most of these studies did not use a uniform implantable defibrillator system or a standardized protocol to measure the defibrillation threshold and, thus, did not control for the influence of these technical influences. We postulated that defibrillator and defibrillation threshold measurement-based sources of variability overshadowed important clinical predictors. Methods. The defibrillation threshold was measured by using a standardized protocol in 101 consecutive patients. We used a transvenous unipolar pectoral defibrillation system that employed a single endocardial right ventricular defibrillation coil as the anode and the shell of an 80-cm(3) pulse generator as the cathode to deliver a 65% tilt biphasic pulse. Results. Several clinical variables were found to be significantly associated with the defibrillation threshold: patient gender, height, weight, body surface area, heart rate at rest, QRS and corrected QT (QTc) intervals, left ventricular mass and several measures of heart and chest size by chest roentgenogram. None of these variables had a correlation coefficient >0.45 with the defibrillation threshold. On multivariate analysis, left ventricular mass and heart rate at rest were the only independent predictors of the defibrillation threshold and explained only 25% of the observed variability. Conclusions. Despite the use of a uniform transvenous defibrillation system and a standardized protocol to measure the defibrillation threshold, no clinically relevant correlation was found between clinical variables and the defibrillation threshold. The defibrillation threshold is probably a function of a complex interaction of anatomic, physiologic and cellular variables that are not adequately represented by easily obtainable clinical information. It is probably not possible to predict defibrillation outcome from standard clinical variables.
引用
收藏
页码:1576 / 1583
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF CAPACITANCE ON THE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD IN PATIENTS USING A NEW UNIPOLAR DEFIBRILLATION SYSTEM
    JUNG, W
    MOOSDORF, R
    KORTE, T
    WOLPERT, C
    SPEHL, S
    BAUER, T
    MANZ, M
    CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (04) : 229 - 229
  • [2] Early Postoperative Rise in Defibrillation Threshold Associated with Hematoma Formation with Unipolar Defibrillation System
    Yazmajian D.Y.
    Schwartzman D.
    Callans D.J.
    Gottieb C.D.
    Marchlinski F.E.
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 1997, 1 (2) : 135 - 137
  • [3] THE DEVELOPMENT OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERSION DEFIBRILLATION SYSTEMS - THE CLINICAL CHRONICLE OF DEFIBRILLATION LEADS
    TIMMIS, GC
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1994, 127 (04) : 1003 - 1009
  • [4] Comparison of a unipolar defibrillation system with a dual lead system using an enlarged defibrillation anode
    Mattke, S
    Fiek, M
    Markewitz, A
    Muller, D
    Hoffmann, E
    Schmockel, M
    Steinbeck, G
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (12): : 2083 - 2088
  • [5] RELATION OF THE INTRAOPERATIVE DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD TO SUCCESSFUL POSTOPERATIVE DEFIBRILLATION WITH AN AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
    MARCHLINSKI, FE
    FLORES, B
    MILLER, JM
    GOTTLIEB, CD
    HARGROVE, WC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 62 (07): : 393 - 398
  • [6] Predictors of atrial defibrillation threshold in internal cardioversion
    Boriani, G
    Biffi, M
    Camanini, C
    Bacchi, L
    Zannoli, R
    Luceri, R
    Branzi, A
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 23 (11): : 1898 - 1901
  • [7] Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with and without Defibrillation Threshold Testing
    Codner, Pablo
    Nevzorov, Roman
    Kusniec, Jairo
    Haim, Moti
    Zabarski, Ronit
    Strasberg, Boris
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (06): : 343 - 346
  • [8] Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator:: long-term stability of the defibrillation threshold using a unipolar lead system ("active-can")
    Knuefermann, P
    Wolpert, C
    Spehl, S
    Korte, T
    Manz, M
    Lüderitz, B
    Jung, W
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 2000, 89 (09): : 774 - 780
  • [9] Predictors of High Defibrillation Threshold in the Modern Era
    Lin, Edward F.
    Dalal, Darshan
    Cheng, Alan
    Marine, Joseph E.
    Nazarian, Saman
    Sinha, Sunil
    Spragg, David D.
    Tandri, Harikrishna
    Halperin, Henry
    Calkins, Hugh
    Berger, Ronald D.
    Tomaselli, Gordon F.
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (02): : 231 - 237
  • [10] IS THERE A DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLD
    DAVY, JM
    FAIN, E
    DORIAN, P
    WINKLE, RA
    CIRCULATION, 1984, 70 (04) : 406 - 406