Tax Incidence and Inequality of Thai General Government Taxation System

被引:0
|
作者
Aemkulwat, Chairat [1 ]
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Econ, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
来源
APPLIED ECONOMICS JOURNAL | 2015年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Tax Incidence; Size Distribution of Income; Inequality; Gini Coefficient;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Indirect Taxes comprise 47.9 percent of tax revenues of the Thai general government whereas direct taxes comprise 40.7 percent in 2014. In terms of national income, the revenue of the Thai general government is 25.71 percent - central government contributing 22.79 percent and local government contributing 2.92 percent. It can also be divided into direct tax share of 10.92 percent, indirect tax share of 11.62 percent, and non-tax share of 3.17 percent. Direct taxes except land maintenance tax - personal income tax, corporation income tax, petroleum income tax, building and land tax, land registration fee, motor vehicle tax, and signboard tax - increase progressivity and decrease inequality. Indirect taxes except custom duties - value added tax, excise tax, and other local indirect taxes - decrease progressivity and increase inequality. In the base case, the poorest 10 percent bears 21.57 percent while the richest 10 percent bears 26.55 percent, contributing to a decrease of the ratio of income of richest 10 (20) percent to that of poorest 10 (20) percent to 19.25 (10.77) times, compared to 20.70 (11.50) in the case of before-tax income. In the case of elastic demand and supply, decile 1 bears 17.67 percent while decile 10 bears 26.92 percent, contributing to a decrease of the ratio of income of the richest 10 (20) percent to that of the poorest 10 (20) percent to 18.36 (10.32) times. Finally, Gini coefficient may rise or fall after tax. It increases to 0.501, a jump of 2.2 percent in the base case but falls to 0.461, a drop of 5.9 percent in the case of elastic demand and supply.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 53
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] INCREASED TAX RATES IN THE TAXATION SYSTEM OF THE REPUBLIC OF LITHUANIA
    Sudavicius, Bronius
    Endrijaitis, Martynas
    [J]. PRAVOPRIMENENIE-LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 4 (02): : 28 - 40
  • [42] TAXATION SYSTEM IN POLAND: WAYS OF REDUCING THE TAX GAP
    Mierzejewska, Malgorzata
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACCOUNTING, AUDITING, AND TAXATION (ICAAT 2016), 2016, 27 : 354 - 365
  • [43] THE ROLE OF WEALTH TAXATION IN THE OVERALL TAX-SYSTEM
    MINTZ, JM
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC POLICY-ANALYSE DE POLITIQUES, 1991, 17 (03): : 248 - 263
  • [44] Nonlinear analysis of government expenditure and tax rate on income inequality in India
    Padhan, Hemachandra
    Haouas, Ilham
    Hammoudeh, Shawkat
    Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 2022, 22 (03)
  • [45] The Tax Advantage of Big Business: How the Structure of Corporate Taxation Fuels Concentration and Inequality
    Hager, Sandy Brian
    Baines, Joseph
    [J]. POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2020, 48 (02) : 275 - 305
  • [46] The Inequality Effects of a Dual Income Tax System
    Lambert, Peter J.
    Thoresen, Thor O.
    [J]. B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2012, 12 (01):
  • [47] THE TAX SYSTEM AS A GENERATOR OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY IN CROATIA
    Skalamera-Alilovic, Dunja
    Rubinic, Ivan
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD), 2016, : 459 - 477
  • [48] The incidence of personal income taxation: evidence from the tax reform act of 1986
    Kubik, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (7-8) : 1567 - 1588
  • [49] Taxation of second-degree cooperatives in the common State tax system and the Basque regional tax system
    Aguilar Rubio, Marina
    [J]. BOLETIN DE LA ASOCIACION INTERNACIONAL DE DERECHO COOPERATIVO-INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COOPERATIVE LAW JOURNAL, 2021, 59 : 129 - 147
  • [50] TAX INCIDENCE, A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH - KELLER,WJ
    DEWOLFF, P
    [J]. ECONOMIST, 1982, 130 (02): : 287 - 288