Explaining the construction of global carbon markets: REDD+ as a test case?

被引:1
|
作者
Wolff, Franziska [1 ]
机构
[1] Oka Inst eV, Environm Law & Governance Div, Schicklerstr 5-7, D-10179 Berlin, Germany
关键词
carbon markets; carbon market development; carbon trading; emissions trading; new institutionalism; institutional change; regime formation; regime change; market-based instruments; flexible instruments; CDM; Kyoto Protocol; REDD+; deforestation; sinks;
D O I
10.1504/IJGEI.2011.045032
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Market-based instruments increasingly shape international environmental governance. Against this background, this paper puts forward a conceptual framework on the development of regulated global carbon markets. Regarding the adoption of carbon trading as an instance of wider shifts in governance allows us to benefit from the rich literature on (international) institutional change. At the same time it enables us to integrate existing social science accounts of the construction of carbon markets into a more generic conceptualisation. An analytical framework is suggested that models a set of five (recursively interacting) factors as causes of and influences on the development of international carbon markets: actor interests; power distribution; discourses; institutional dynamics and interaction; and exogenous shocks. The framework is applied to the empirical example of the emerging UNFCCC mechanism for 'Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries' (REDD+). Finally, the generalisability of the findings is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 274
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems
    Gupta, Aarti
    Lovbrand, Eva
    Turnhout, Esther
    Vijge, Marjanneke J.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (06) : 726 - 731
  • [22] High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+
    Asner G.P.
    Mascaro J.
    Anderson C.
    Knapp D.E.
    Martin R.E.
    Kennedy-Bowdoin T.
    van Breugel M.
    Davies S.
    Hall J.S.
    Muller-Landau H.C.
    Potvin C.
    Sousa W.
    Wright J.
    Bermingham E.
    [J]. Carbon Balance and Management, 8 (1)
  • [24] REDD plus , RFM, Development, and Carbon Markets
    Louman, Bastiaan
    Cifuentes, Miguel
    Chacon, Mario
    [J]. FORESTS, 2011, 2 (01): : 357 - 372
  • [25] Forest Biodiversity Monitoring for REDD+: A Case Study of Actors’ Views in Peru
    Steffen K. Entenmann
    Thomas A. M. Kaphegyi
    Christine B. Schmitt
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2014, 53 : 300 - 317
  • [26] Who Owns REDD plus ? Carbon Markets, Carbon Rights and Entitlements to REDD plus Finance
    Streck, Charlotte
    [J]. FORESTS, 2020, 11 (09):
  • [27] Community perceptions of REDD+: a case study from Papua New Guinea
    Leggett, Matthew
    Lovell, Heather
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2012, 12 (01) : 115 - 134
  • [28] Determining methane uptake in tropical agroforestry soils: a case for inclusion in REDD+ 
    Callie Mills
    Richard Mbatu
    Yasin Elshorbany
    [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2023, 97 : 573 - 586
  • [29] Taking Stock of Carbon Rights in REDD+ Candidate Countries: Concept Meets Reality
    Loft, Lasse
    Ravikumar, Ashwin
    Gebara, Maria Fernanda
    Thu Thuy Pham
    Resosudarmo, Ida Aju Pradnja
    Assembe, Samuel
    Gonzales Tovar, Jazmin
    Mwangi, Esther
    Andersson, Krister
    [J]. FORESTS, 2015, 6 (04): : 1031 - 1060
  • [30] Corrigendum to "The structure and pattern of global partnerships in the REDD+ mechanism" (vol 135, 102640, 2022)
    Shin, Seongmin
    Park, Mi Sun
    Lee, Hansol
    Baral, Himlal
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2022, 141