SUGGESTED REMEDY FOR OBSTRUCTIONS TO EXPERT TESTIMONY BY RULES OF EVIDENCE

被引：3

|

作者：

Morgan, Edmund M.

机构：

来源：

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW | 1943年 / 10卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1597074

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：285 / 297

页数：13

相关论文

共 50 条

[31] EXPERT TESTIMONY AND SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IN ARSON-RELATED CASES
KANTROWITZ, SB
[J]. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 1981, 26 (01) : 142 - 152
[32] INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE AS A BASIS FOR EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY - A RESPONSE TO CARLSON
RICE, PR
[J]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 1987, 40 (03) : 583 - 596
[33] Juror knowledge of eyewitness behavior: Evidence for the necessity of expert testimony
Durham, MD
Dane, FC
[J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1999, 14 (02): : 299 - 308
[34] RULEMAKING POSSIBILITIES: EFFORTS OF THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL CONFERENCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON EVIDENCE RULES TO ADDRESS THE CHALLENGES TO FORENSIC EXPERT TESTIMONY
Capra, Daniel J.
[J]. FRONTIERS OF LAW IN CHINA, 2018, 13 (01) : 34 - 42
[35] The impact of expert testimony on jurors' decisions: Gender of the expert and testimony complexity
Schuller, RA
Terry, D
McKimmie, B
[J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 35 (06) : 1266 - 1280
[36] ADMISSION OF EXPERT TESTIMONY IN HEARSAY FORM - FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE 803(6), 803(8)(C), AND 803(18)
PIERCE, RJ
[J]. FORUM-AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 1981, 17 (02): : 500 - 509
[37] FORMER-TESTIMONY EXCEPTION IN PROPOSED FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE
MARTIN, MM
[J]. IOWA LAW REVIEW, 1972, 57 (03) : 547 - 596
[38] OPINION AND EXPERT EVIDENCE UNDER FEDERAL RULES
GARNER, HE
[J]. LOUISIANA LAW REVIEW, 1975, 36 (01): : 123 - 138
[39] EXPERT WITNESSES AND FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
MCELHANEY, JW
[J]. MERCER LAW REVIEW, 1977, 28 (02) : 463 - 495
[40] TECHNIQUE VERSUS SCIENCE: A SUGGESTED REMEDY
Mann, Margaret
[J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1919, 44 (10) : 683 - 683

← 1 2 3 4 5 →