Curriculum assessment as a direct tool in ABET outcomes assessment in a chemical engineering programme

被引:33
|
作者
Abu-Jdayil, Basim [1 ]
Al-Attar, Hazim [1 ]
机构
[1] UAE Univ, Chem & Petr Engn Dept, POB 17555, Al Ain, U Arab Emirates
关键词
ABET accreditation; assessment tools; chemical engineering; curriculum evaluation; outcomes assessment;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2010.483276
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The chemical engineering programme at the United Arab Emirates University is designed to fulfil the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) (A-K) EC2000 criteria. The Department of Chemical&Petroleum Engineering has established a well-defined process for outcomes assessment for the chemical engineering programme in order to ensure that its graduates achieve the programme educational objectives. Different direct and indirect tools are implemented in the assessment process. Among these tools, the greatest weight in the assessment process has been given to the curriculum (30%). The course and curriculum assessment usually plays an important role in improving the course content and quality; as it should provide considerable information on the effectiveness of an academic programme. This paper aims to discuss the methods used to assess the courses/curriculum of the chemical engineering programme as an important direct tool in the assessment process for ABET accreditation. Application of the curriculum assessment results in the continuous improvement of chemical engineering programmes is also addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 505
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Review of engineering programme outcome assessment models
    Liew, Chia Pao
    Puteh, Marlia
    Mohammad, Shahrin
    Omar, Abdul Aziz
    Kiew, Peck Loo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2021, 46 (05) : 834 - 848
  • [32] Chemical risk assessment at the International Programme on Chemical Safety
    Aitio, A
    [J]. WORK IN THE GLOBAL VILLAGE, 2002, 49 : 49 - 52
  • [33] Design integrated in the mechanical engineering curriculum: Assessment of the engineering clinics
    Kadlowec, Jennifer
    Bhatia, Krishnan
    Chandrupatla, Tirupathi R.
    Chen, John C.
    Constans, Eric
    Hartman, Harriet
    Marchese, Anthony J.
    von Lockette, Paris
    Zhang, Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2007, 129 (07) : 682 - 691
  • [34] Implementing Direct and Indirect Assessment in the MIS Curriculum
    Merhout, Jeffery
    Benamati, John
    Rajkumar, T. M.
    Anderson, Paul
    Marado, David
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 : 419 - 436
  • [35] Minimizing Effort for ABET Student Outcomes Assessment While Maintaining Effective Results
    Miller, Jeffrey
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE & COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (CSCI), 2016, : 365 - 369
  • [36] THE COMPETITION AS ASSESSMENT TOOL IN ROBOTICS ENGINEERING
    Martinez-Martin, Ester
    Pertusa, Antonio
    Costa, Angelo
    Gomez-Donoso, Francisco
    Escalona, Felix
    Viejo, Diego
    Cazorla, Miguel
    [J]. 14TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2020), 2020, : 1082 - 1085
  • [37] Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment for Individual Student Assessment and Curricular Evaluation
    Scott, Day M.
    Bennett, Lunawati L.
    Ferrill, Mary J.
    Brown, Daniel L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 74 (10) : 183
  • [38] Risk assessment as an engineering tool in landfills
    Mavropoulos, A
    Kaliampakos, D
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2002, : 411 - 420
  • [39] A Web-Based Course Assessment Tool with Direct Mapping to Student Outcomes
    Ibrahim, Walid
    Atif, Yacine
    Shuaib, Khaled
    Sampson, Demetrios
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 2015, 18 (02): : 46 - 59
  • [40] Differential assessment of the ABET "a-k" program outcomes based on learning domains
    Pape, D. A.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION - 2005: MECHANICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT HEADS, 2005, : 283 - 290