Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options

被引:53
|
作者
Kearns, Marie [1 ,2 ]
Ermogenous, Panagiotis [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Myers, Simon [1 ]
Ghanem, Ali Mahmoud [1 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Acad Plast Surg, London, England
[2] Glasgow Royal Infirm, Canniesburn Plast Surg Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Nicosia Gen Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Nicosia, Cyprus
[4] Nicosia Gen Hosp, Burns Unit, Nicosia, Cyprus
来源
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS | 2018年 / 45卷 / 06期
关键词
Free tissue flaps; Mandibular reconstruction; Quality of life; Postoperative complications;
D O I
10.5999/aps.2017.01592
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
With significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous flaps; the free fibula flap, the scapula flap, the iliac crest flap and the radial forearm flap. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles relevant to donor site morbidity for these flaps. We assessed morbidity in terms of incidence of delayed healing, chronic pain, aesthetic outcomes, site specific complications and patient satisfaction/quality of life. Weighted means were calculated when sufficient studies were available for review. The radial forearm and free fibula flaps are associated with high rates of delayed healing of approximately 20% compared to the scapular (< 10%) and iliac flaps (5%). The radial forearm flap has higher rates of chronic pain (16.7%) and dissatisfaction with scar appearance (33%). For the majority of these patients harvest of one of these four osteocutaneous does not limit daily function at long-term follow-up. The scapular osteocutaneous flap is associated with the lowest relative morbidity and should be strongly considered when the recipient defect allows. The radial forearm is associated with higher morbidity in terms of scarring, fractures, chronic pain and wrist function and should not be considered as first choice when other flap options are available.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 503
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-reported donor-site morbidity following anterolateral thigh free flaps
    Lipa, JE
    Novak, CB
    Binhammer, PA
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2005, 21 (06) : 365 - 370
  • [42] Microvasular Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Complication and Outcome of 80 Flaps
    Gur Paramjeet Singh Gill
    Priyadarshan Chitale
    Rupinder Bakshi
    Amit Yadav
    Vikram Jeet Singh Gill
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2022, 74 : 6246 - 6250
  • [43] Microvasular Free Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Surgery: Complication and Outcome of 80 Flaps
    Gill, Gur Paramjeet Singh
    Chitale, Priyadarshan
    Bakshi, Rupinder
    Yadav, Amit
    Gill, Vikram Jeet Singh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 74 (SUPPL 3) : 6246 - 6250
  • [44] Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site in the Context of Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction
    Khyati Jani
    Nirav Maharaja
    Nisha Rajrattansingh Akali
    Deepak Balasubramanian
    Janarthanan Ramu
    Jimmy Mathew
    Mohit Sharma
    Krishnakumar Thankappan
    Subramania Iyer
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 11 : 192 - 195
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Mohs Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Garg, Neha
    Mandloi, Shreya
    Queenan, Natalia
    Trivedi, Jay
    Mccann, Adam
    Xu, Vivian
    Amin, Dev
    Krein, Howard
    Heffelfinger, Ryan
    OTO OPEN, 2024, 8 (04)
  • [46] Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Donor Site in the Context of Head and Neck Cancer Reconstruction
    Jani, Khyati
    Maharaja, Nirav
    Akali, Nisha Rajrattansingh
    Balasubramanian, Deepak
    Ramu, Janarthanan
    Mathew, Jimmy
    Sharma, Mohit
    Thankappan, Krishnakumar
    Iyer, Subramania
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 11 (02) : 192 - 195
  • [47] Computed Tomographic Angiography Perforator Localization for Virtual Surgical Planning of Osteocutaneous Fibular Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Ettinger, Kyle S.
    Alexander, Amy E.
    Arce, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (10) : 2220 - 2230
  • [48] Suprafascial Anterolateral Thigh Flap Harvest: A Better Way to Minimize Donor-Site Morbidity in Head and Neck Reconstruction
    Chen, Yen-Chou
    Scaglioni, Mario F.
    Jimenez, Leonardo Enrique Carrillo
    Yang, Johnson Chia-Shen
    Huang, Eng-Yen
    Lin, Tsan-Shiun
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (03) : 689 - 698
  • [49] Simplifying microvascular head and neck reconstruction: A rational approach to donor site selection
    Disa, JJ
    Pusic, AL
    Hidalgo, DH
    Cordeiro, PG
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 47 (04) : 385 - 389
  • [50] THE LATISSIMUS-DORSI DONOR SITE - CURRENT USE IN HEAD AND NECK RECONSTRUCTION
    HAUGHEY, BH
    FREDRICKSON, JM
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 1991, 117 (10) : 1129 - 1134